From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-186594-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8005 invoked by alias); 22 May 2006 13:15:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 7649 invoked by uid 48); 22 May 2006 13:14:56 -0000
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 13:15:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug c/27719]  New: ICE on invalid function definition
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-27719-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg02150.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

The following invalid code snippet triggers an ICE in the C frontend
since at least GCC 2.95.3:

==================
void foo()[] {}
==================

bug.c:1: error: declaration of 'foo' as array of voids
bug.c:1: internal compiler error: tree check: expected function_decl, have
var_decl in start_function, at c-decl.c:5933
Please submit a full bug report, [etc.]


-- 
           Summary: ICE on invalid function definition
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, error-recovery, monitored
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27719