From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-186643-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4447 invoked by alias); 22 May 2006 20:08:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 4373 invoked by uid 48); 22 May 2006 20:08:16 -0000
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 20:08:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug c++/27732]  New: Parentheses elicit spurious error: "missing '>' to terminate the template argument list"
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-27732-10061@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "widman at gimpel dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg02199.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

I get spurious errors from g++ in the following cases: 

// case 1:
int m;
template< int* p> struct A { };
template<> struct A<&(m)>;

// case 2:
int m;
template< int* p> struct A { };
template<> struct A<(&m)>;

Just a guess:  is there something about the parse of '(' that gums up the
works?


-- 
           Summary: Parentheses elicit spurious error: "missing '>' to
                    terminate the template argument list"
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: widman at gimpel dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27732