From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-189218-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22865 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2006 02:55:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 22846 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jun 2006 02:55:42 -0000
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 03:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug c++/28053]  New: [4.2 regression] ICE deriving from class with invalid bitfield
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-28053-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg01503.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

The following invalid code snippet causes an ICE on mainline:

============================================
struct X {};

struct A
{
    X x : 2;
};

struct B : A {};
============================================

bug.cc:5: error: bit-field 'X A::x' with non-integral type
bug.cc:8: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report, [etc.]

This is a very recent regression (GCC 4.2.0 20060527 was not affected).


-- 
           Summary: [4.2 regression] ICE deriving from class with invalid
                    bitfield
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, error-recovery, monitored
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28053