public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libmudflap/28077]  New: [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha
@ 2006-06-18 17:16 tbm at cyrius dot com
  2006-06-18 17:37 ` [Bug libmudflap/28077] " tbm at cyrius dot com
                   ` (11 more replies)
  0 siblings, 12 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: tbm at cyrius dot com @ 2006-06-18 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

libmudflap.cth/pass39-frag.c (and I think pass37-frag.c) produce mudflap
violations on Alpha.  In dmesg, you get messages like these:

 pass39-frag.exe(7421): unaligned trap at 0000000120001ff8: b029001c2022000f 29
1 
 pass39-frag.exe(7552): unaligned trap at 0000000120001ff8: b029001c2022000f 29
1
 pass39-frag.exe(7421): unaligned trap at 0000000120001ff8: b029001c2022000f 29
1

I'll attach the relevant portions of libmudflap.log.


-- 
           Summary: [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap
                    violation on alpha
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libmudflap
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
 GCC build triplet: alpha-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: alpha-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28077


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha
  2006-06-18 17:16 [Bug libmudflap/28077] New: [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha tbm at cyrius dot com
@ 2006-06-18 17:37 ` tbm at cyrius dot com
  2006-06-19 14:22 ` fche at redhat dot com
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: tbm at cyrius dot com @ 2006-06-18 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com  2006-06-18 17:16 -------
Created an attachment (id=11691)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11691&action=view)
testsuite logs


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28077


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha
  2006-06-18 17:16 [Bug libmudflap/28077] New: [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha tbm at cyrius dot com
  2006-06-18 17:37 ` [Bug libmudflap/28077] " tbm at cyrius dot com
@ 2006-06-19 14:22 ` fche at redhat dot com
  2006-06-19 19:40 ` tbm at cyrius dot com
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2006-06-19 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from fche at redhat dot com  2006-06-19 14:01 -------
It looks like only the statically linked multithreding test cases trigger the
problem.  Would you mind trying ot hand-build one of those executables, but
adding -rdynamic to LDFLAGS, and run with -backtrace=99 in MUDFLAP_OPTIONS? 
That way, the backtraces should have more symbolic information.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28077


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha
  2006-06-18 17:16 [Bug libmudflap/28077] New: [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha tbm at cyrius dot com
  2006-06-18 17:37 ` [Bug libmudflap/28077] " tbm at cyrius dot com
  2006-06-19 14:22 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2006-06-19 19:40 ` tbm at cyrius dot com
  2006-09-10 16:56 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: tbm at cyrius dot com @ 2006-06-19 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from tbm at cyrius dot com  2006-06-19 19:34 -------
Created an attachment (id=11705)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11705&action=view)
more detailed log

This is with the options you specified but it seems it doesn't contain so much
more information.  Did I do something wrong or is that what you were looking
for?


-- 

tbm at cyrius dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #11691|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28077


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha
  2006-06-18 17:16 [Bug libmudflap/28077] New: [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha tbm at cyrius dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-06-19 19:40 ` tbm at cyrius dot com
@ 2006-09-10 16:56 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-09-20 22:08 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-10 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.1.2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28077


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha
  2006-06-18 17:16 [Bug libmudflap/28077] New: [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha tbm at cyrius dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-09-10 16:56 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-09-20 22:08 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-02-14  9:40 ` [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-20 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28077


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.1/4.2/4.3 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha
  2006-06-18 17:16 [Bug libmudflap/28077] New: [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha tbm at cyrius dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-09-20 22:08 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-02-14  9:40 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-07-04 21:25 ` [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-14  9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.1.2                       |4.1.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28077


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha
  2006-06-18 17:16 [Bug libmudflap/28077] New: [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha tbm at cyrius dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-02-14  9:40 ` [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-04 21:25 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-12-18 15:34 ` [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.2/4.3 " ubizjak at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-04 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-07-04 21:25 -------
Closing 4.1 branch.


-- 

jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 regression]|[4.2/4.3/4.4 regression]
                   |pass39-frag.c produces      |pass39-frag.c produces
                   |mudflap violation on alpha  |mudflap violation on alpha
   Target Milestone|4.1.3                       |4.2.5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28077


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.2/4.3 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha
  2006-06-18 17:16 [Bug libmudflap/28077] New: [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha tbm at cyrius dot com
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-07-04 21:25 ` [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-18 15:34 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
  2009-02-03 11:18 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2008-12-18 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2008-12-18 15:31 -------
This does not fail on 4.4 [1] branch.

[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-12/msg01564.html


-- 

ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[4.2/4.3/4.4 regression]    |[4.2/4.3 regression] pass39-
                   |pass39-frag.c produces      |frag.c produces mudflap
                   |mudflap violation on alpha  |violation on alpha


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28077


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.2/4.3 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha
  2006-06-18 17:16 [Bug libmudflap/28077] New: [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha tbm at cyrius dot com
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-12-18 15:34 ` [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.2/4.3 " ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2009-02-03 11:18 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
  2009-03-31 19:39 ` [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.3 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2009-02-03 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2009-02-03 11:18 -------
Can someone check if this still fails on latest 4.3 branch?

4.4 works OK.


-- 

ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28077


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.3 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha
  2006-06-18 17:16 [Bug libmudflap/28077] New: [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha tbm at cyrius dot com
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-02-03 11:18 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2009-03-31 19:39 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-08-04 12:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-09-29 21:41 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-31 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-03-31 19:39 -------
Closing 4.2 branch.


-- 

jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[4.2/4.3 regression] pass39-|[4.3 regression] pass39-
                   |frag.c produces mudflap     |frag.c produces mudflap
                   |violation on alpha          |violation on alpha
   Target Milestone|4.2.5                       |4.3.4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28077


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.3 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha
  2006-06-18 17:16 [Bug libmudflap/28077] New: [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha tbm at cyrius dot com
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-03-31 19:39 ` [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.3 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-04 12:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-09-29 21:41 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-08-04 12:27 -------
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.3.4                       |4.3.5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28077


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.3 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha
  2006-06-18 17:16 [Bug libmudflap/28077] New: [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha tbm at cyrius dot com
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-08-04 12:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-09-29 21:41 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2009-09-29 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2009-09-29 21:41 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> Can someone check if this still fails on latest 4.3 branch?

It doesn't. See [1].

[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-09/msg01497.html


-- 

ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28077


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-29 21:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-06-18 17:16 [Bug libmudflap/28077] New: [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha tbm at cyrius dot com
2006-06-18 17:37 ` [Bug libmudflap/28077] " tbm at cyrius dot com
2006-06-19 14:22 ` fche at redhat dot com
2006-06-19 19:40 ` tbm at cyrius dot com
2006-09-10 16:56 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-20 22:08 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-14  9:40 ` [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 21:25 ` [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-18 15:34 ` [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.2/4.3 " ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-02-03 11:18 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-03-31 19:39 ` [Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.3 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-29 21:41 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).