* [Bug bootstrap/28124] Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6
2006-06-21 14:59 [Bug bootstrap/28124] New: Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6 ray at ultramarine dot com
@ 2006-06-21 15:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-21 15:01 ` ray at ultramarine dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-21 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 14:58 -------
What do you mean by G6 there is no such thing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28124
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/28124] Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6
2006-06-21 14:59 [Bug bootstrap/28124] New: Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6 ray at ultramarine dot com
2006-06-21 15:00 ` [Bug bootstrap/28124] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-21 15:01 ` ray at ultramarine dot com
2006-06-21 15:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ray at ultramarine dot com @ 2006-06-21 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2006-06-21 15:00 -------
Subject: Re: Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 14:58 -------
> What do you mean by G6 there is no such thing.
>
Sorry about that G5 was intended,
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28124
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/28124] Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6
2006-06-21 14:59 [Bug bootstrap/28124] New: Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6 ray at ultramarine dot com
2006-06-21 15:00 ` [Bug bootstrap/28124] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-21 15:01 ` ray at ultramarine dot com
@ 2006-06-21 15:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-21 20:33 ` fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-21 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 15:01 -------
Use --disable-multilib, it is trying to build 64bit programs and running them
but you don't have a 64bit machine, there is only a mac mini G4.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28124
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/28124] Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6
2006-06-21 14:59 [Bug bootstrap/28124] New: Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6 ray at ultramarine dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-21 15:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-21 20:33 ` fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
2006-06-21 20:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: fang at csl dot cornell dot edu @ 2006-06-21 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-06-21 20:32 -------
My heart skipped a beat when you said G6! *sigh*
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28124
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/28124] Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6
2006-06-21 14:59 [Bug bootstrap/28124] New: Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6 ray at ultramarine dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-21 20:33 ` fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
@ 2006-06-21 20:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-21 20:55 ` fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
2006-06-21 21:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-21 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 20:33 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> My heart skipped a beat when you said G6! *sigh*
Buy a PS3 instead (sorry could not help myself for promoting the company I work
for now).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fang at csl dot cornell dot
| |edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28124
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/28124] Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6
2006-06-21 14:59 [Bug bootstrap/28124] New: Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6 ray at ultramarine dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-21 20:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-21 20:55 ` fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
2006-06-21 21:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: fang at csl dot cornell dot edu @ 2006-06-21 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2006-06-21 20:49 -------
Subject: Re: Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6
> ------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 20:33 -------
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > My heart skipped a beat when you said G6! *sigh*
>
> Buy a PS3 instead (sorry could not help myself for promoting the company I work
> for now).
I will consider it once there's a port of gcc for the Cell processor. :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28124
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/28124] Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6
2006-06-21 14:59 [Bug bootstrap/28124] New: Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6 ray at ultramarine dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-21 20:55 ` fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
@ 2006-06-21 21:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-21 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 20:55 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> I will consider it once there's a port of gcc for the Cell processor. :)
There is one, just not officially part of the FSF GCC. And yes we (Sony) are
working on submitting it to the FSF.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28124
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread