public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/28463]  New: Using -fdump-tree-optimized causes a huge compile time memory regression
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:14:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-28463-10053@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

Enabling some tree dumps causes a tramp3d-v4 compile to run into swap,
requiring
about 50% more ram than a non-dumped compile.

Pinskia suggests

Index: gcc/cgraph.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/cgraph.c        (revision 115684)
+++ gcc/cgraph.c        (working copy)
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ cgraph_remove_node (struct cgraph_node *
        kill_body = true;
     }

-  if (kill_body && !dump_enabled_p (TDI_tree_all) && flag_unit_at_a_time)
+  if (kill_body && flag_unit_at_a_time)
     {
       DECL_SAVED_TREE (node->decl) = NULL;
       DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (node->decl) = NULL;
Index: gcc/cgraphunit.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/cgraphunit.c    (revision 115684)
+++ gcc/cgraphunit.c    (working copy)
@@ -1466,7 +1466,6 @@ cgraph_optimize (void)
   /* Double check that all inline clones are gone and that all
      function bodies have been released from memory.  */
   if (flag_unit_at_a_time
-      && !dump_enabled_p (TDI_tree_all)
       && !(sorrycount || errorcount))
     {
       struct cgraph_node *node;


but there may be non-GCable cost of dumping itself.


-- 
           Summary: Using -fdump-tree-optimized causes a huge compile time
                    memory regression
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: memory-hog
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28463


             reply	other threads:[~2006-07-23 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-23 15:14 rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2006-07-23 15:22 ` [Bug middle-end/28463] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-24 11:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-10 16:59 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-10 22:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-28463-10053@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).