From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-195160-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25053 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2006 22:43:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 25037 invoked by uid 48); 27 Aug 2006 22:43:22 -0000
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug fortran/28866]  New: [Regression] Simple if statements are not so simple
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-28866-10110@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg02392.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

The following program fails to compile because the commit 
noted in the comment broke the processing of a chain of
matchers.

! { dg-do compile }
! Test fix for regression caused by 
! 2006-06-23  Steven G. Kargl  <kargls@comcast.net>
!    PR fortran/27981
!    * match.c (gfc_match_if):  Handle errors in assignment in simple if.
!
module read
  integer i, j, k
  contains
    subroutine a
      if (i .eq. 0) read(j,*) k
    end subroutine a
end module read

I'm currently testing a patch to fix the problem.  Note, this effects only 4.2.


-- 
           Summary: [Regression] Simple if statements are not so simple
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28866