public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/29003] New: operator name accepted in typedef
@ 2006-09-10 10:28 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-12 5:21 ` [Bug c++/29003] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-10 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The following invalid code snippet is accepted since at least GCC 2.95.3:
============================
typedef int operator! ();
============================
With such a broken declaration it's easy to crash the compiler afterwards:
============================
struct A {};
typedef int operator! (A);
int i = !A();
============================
bug.cc:3: error: argument dependent lookup finds 'operator!'
bug.cc:5: error: in call to 'operator!'
bug.cc:5: internal compiler error: tree check: expected function_type or
method_type, have error_mark in add_function_candidate, at cp/call.c:1327
Please submit a full bug report, [etc.]
--
Summary: operator name accepted in typedef
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, accepts-invalid, monitored
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29003
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/29003] operator name accepted in typedef
2006-09-10 10:28 [Bug c++/29003] New: operator name accepted in typedef reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-09-12 5:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-25 9:41 ` tbm at cyrius dot com
2007-08-28 20:16 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-12 5:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 05:21 -------
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-09-12 05:21:39
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29003
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/29003] operator name accepted in typedef
2006-09-10 10:28 [Bug c++/29003] New: operator name accepted in typedef reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-12 5:21 ` [Bug c++/29003] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-08-25 9:41 ` tbm at cyrius dot com
2007-08-28 20:16 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: tbm at cyrius dot com @ 2007-08-25 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 515 bytes --]
------- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-08-25 09:41 -------
I also get this ICE with 4.3, but with 4.2 I get the following instead:
(sid)25944:tbm@em64t: ~/src/a] g++-4.2 -c t.cc
t.cc:3: error: argument dependent lookup finds âoperator!â
t.cc:5: error: in call to âoperator!â
t.cc:5: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
Preprocessed source stored into /tmp/ccGjUbxr.out file, please attach this to
your bugreport.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29003
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/29003] operator name accepted in typedef
2006-09-10 10:28 [Bug c++/29003] New: operator name accepted in typedef reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-12 5:21 ` [Bug c++/29003] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-25 9:41 ` tbm at cyrius dot com
@ 2007-08-28 20:16 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-08-28 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-28 20:16 -------
The message "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" is nothing but a hidden
ICE.
In order not to bother the user with GCC's error recovery problems it replaces
the usual ICE message on release branches, if a regular error message has been
issued already.
To see the underlying ICE you have to configure the compiler with
--enable-checking.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29003
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-28 20:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-09-10 10:28 [Bug c++/29003] New: operator name accepted in typedef reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-12 5:21 ` [Bug c++/29003] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-25 9:41 ` tbm at cyrius dot com
2007-08-28 20:16 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).