* [Bug c/29071] gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64
2006-09-13 22:58 [Bug c/29071] New: gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64 howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
@ 2006-09-13 23:00 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2007-12-21 15:11 ` [Bug testsuite/29071] " howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu @ 2006-09-13 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-09-13 23:00 -------
Created an attachment (id=12253)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12253&action=view)
preprocessed file for 20020919.c generated on Darwin PPC at -m64
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/29071] gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64
2006-09-13 22:58 [Bug c/29071] New: gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64 howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2006-09-13 23:00 ` [Bug c/29071] " howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
@ 2007-12-21 15:11 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2007-12-21 15:46 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu @ 2007-12-21 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2007-12-21 15:11 -------
I just noticed that passing -D__powerpc64__ on the compile line for this test
at -m64 for powerpc-apple-darwin9 allows the missed clobbers seem to be
detected. Shouldn't...
# ifndef __powerpc64__
# define REG3 "8"
# define REG4 "9"
# endif
in the gcc.dg/20020919-1.c testcase be rewritten to also include those
definitions
when __powerpc__ and __LP64__ are both defined?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/29071] gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64
2006-09-13 22:58 [Bug c/29071] New: gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64 howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2006-09-13 23:00 ` [Bug c/29071] " howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2007-12-21 15:11 ` [Bug testsuite/29071] " howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
@ 2007-12-21 15:46 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2008-05-20 21:45 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu @ 2007-12-21 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2007-12-21 15:46 -------
Wouldn't something like...
--- 20020919-1.c.org 2007-12-21 10:28:40.000000000 -0500
+++ 20020919-1.c 2007-12-21 10:44:27.000000000 -0500
@@ -41,7 +41,9 @@
|| defined (__POWERPC__) || defined (PPC) || defined (_IBMR2)
# define REG1 "6"
# define REG2 "7"
-# ifndef __powerpc64__
+# if !defined(__powerpc64__) && !((defined (__powerpc__) || defined (__PPC__)
\
+ || defined (__ppc__) || defined (__POWERPC__) || defined (PPC) \
+ || defined (_IBMR2)) && defined(__LP64__))
# define REG3 "8"
# define REG4 "9"
# endif
be more correct here?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/29071] gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64
2006-09-13 22:58 [Bug c/29071] New: gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64 howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-12-21 15:46 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
@ 2008-05-20 21:45 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-06-26 21:22 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-05-20 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-20 21:45 -------
Isn't the proposal in comment #3 the same as this?
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20020919-1.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20020919-1.c (revision 135322)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20020919-1.c (working copy)
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
|| defined (__POWERPC__) || defined (PPC) || defined (_IBMR2)
# define REG1 "6"
# define REG2 "7"
-# ifndef __powerpc64__
+# if !defined(__powerpc64__) && !defined(__LP64__)
# define REG3 "8"
# define REG4 "9"
# endif
We already know that this part is true:
defined (__powerpc__) || defined (__PPC__) || defined (__ppc__) \
|| defined (__POWERPC__) || defined (PPC) || defined (_IBMR2)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/29071] gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64
2006-09-13 22:58 [Bug c/29071] New: gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64 howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-05-20 21:45 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-06-26 21:22 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2008-06-26 21:29 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2008-06-26 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-06-26 21:21 -------
Could the patch in comment #4 be commited?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/29071] gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64
2006-09-13 22:58 [Bug c/29071] New: gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64 howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-06-26 21:22 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2008-06-26 21:29 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2008-06-27 11:53 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2008-06-26 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-06-26 21:29 -------
Forgot to say that I also see this pr on powerpc-apple-darwin9.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/29071] gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64
2006-09-13 22:58 [Bug c/29071] New: gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64 howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2008-06-26 21:29 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2008-06-27 11:53 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2008-12-10 20:32 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2008-06-27 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-06-27 11:53 -------
Before the patch I had:
...
=== gcc Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of expected passes 49011
# of unexpected failures 41
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 180
# of unsupported tests 676
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 98177
# of unexpected failures 65
# of unexpected successes 7
# of expected failures 352
# of unsupported tests 1275
/opt/gcc/darwin_buildw/gcc/xgcc version 4.4.0 [revision 137150p5] 20080626
(experimental) (GCC)
after I have:
...
=== gcc Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of expected passes 49017
# of unexpected failures 35
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 180
# of unsupported tests 676
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 98183
# of unexpected failures 59
# of unexpected successes 7
# of expected failures 352
# of unsupported tests 1275
/opt/gcc/darwin_buildw/gcc/xgcc version 4.4.0 [revision 137169p4] 20080627
(experimental) (GCC)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/29071] gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64
2006-09-13 22:58 [Bug c/29071] New: gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64 howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2008-06-27 11:53 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2008-12-10 20:32 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2008-12-11 23:39 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2008-12-10 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-12-10 20:31 -------
PING! see comment #5.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/29071] gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64
2006-09-13 22:58 [Bug c/29071] New: gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64 howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-10 20:32 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2008-12-11 23:39 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-12 19:42 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-24 10:54 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-11 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-11 23:38 -------
Subject: Bug 29071
Author: janis
Date: Thu Dec 11 23:37:03 2008
New Revision: 142696
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142696
Log:
PR testsuite/29071
* gcc.dg/20020919-1.c: Fix a preprocessor check.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20020919-1.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/29071] gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64
2006-09-13 22:58 [Bug c/29071] New: gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64 howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-11 23:39 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-12 19:42 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-24 10:54 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-12 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-12 19:41 -------
There are no archived test results for powerpc64-*-darwin*, so if someone can
verify that this fixes the test, please report that here or close this PR.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/29071] gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64
2006-09-13 22:58 [Bug c/29071] New: gcc.dg/20020919-1.c compilation test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64 howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-12 19:42 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-24 10:54 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu @ 2010-08-24 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-08-24 10:53 -------
Fixed at r142696.
--
howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread