From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10460 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2006 19:59:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 10407 invoked by uid 48); 15 Sep 2006 19:59:25 -0000 Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 19:59:00 -0000 Subject: [Bug libfortran/29101] New: memory leak in libgfortran X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Message-ID: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "franke dot daniel at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg01492.txt.bz2 List-Id: Please find below a stripped down testcase and a session log from valgrind. The code reads input from stdin, compares what was read against a couple of choices (exactly one in this case) and repeats reading until a single 'x' was entered. The leak is related to the length of the input buffer within the main program, hitting [enter] N times before giving an 'x' results in N leaked blocks of strlen(input). Also involved is the SELECT CASE: if it is replaced by an equivalent IF-statement, no memory is leaked. Reproducible with gfortran-4.1.1 and gfortran-4.2 20060914 (experimental). $> cat test.f90 MODULE stringutils CHARACTER(*), PRIVATE, PARAMETER :: lowercase = 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz' CHARACTER(*), PRIVATE, PARAMETER :: uppercase = 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ' CONTAINS FUNCTION tolower(instr) RESULT (outstr) CHARACTER(len=*), INTENT(in) :: instr CHARACTER(len=len(instr)) :: outstr INTEGER :: i, k outstr = instr DO i = 1, len_trim(outstr) k = index(uppercase, outstr(i:i)) if (k /= 0) outstr(i:i) = lowercase(k:k) END DO END FUNCTION END MODULE MODULE configuration CONTAINS LOGICAL FUNCTION validate_value(input, value) USE stringutils CHARACTER(len=*), INTENT(in) :: input INTEGER, INTENT(out) :: value validate_value = .TRUE. SELECT CASE (tolower(input)) CASE ("x"); value = 1 CASE DEFAULT validate_value = .FALSE. END SELECT END FUNCTION END MODULE PROGRAM test USE configuration USE stringutils INTEGER :: value CHARACTER(len=256) :: input DO WRITE (*, FMT="(A)", ADVANCE = "NO") "$> " READ (*, FMT="(A)") input IF (validate_value(input, value)) EXIT END DO END PROGRAM $> gfortran-4.2 -g -Wall test.f90 $> valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=full ./a.out ==9829== Memcheck, a memory error detector. ==9829== Copyright (C) 2002-2006, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==9829== Using LibVEX rev 1606, a library for dynamic binary translation. ==9829== Copyright (C) 2004-2006, and GNU GPL'd, by OpenWorks LLP. ==9829== Using valgrind-3.2.0, a dynamic binary instrumentation framework. ==9829== Copyright (C) 2000-2006, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==9829== For more details, rerun with: -v ==9829== %> %> %> %> %> %> x ==9829== ==9829== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 3 from 1) ==9829== malloc/free: in use at exit: 1,536 bytes in 6 blocks. ==9829== malloc/free: 24 allocs, 18 frees, 55,080 bytes allocated. ==9829== For counts of detected errors, rerun with: -v ==9829== searching for pointers to 6 not-freed blocks. ==9829== checked 78,156 bytes. ==9829== ==9829== 1,536 bytes in 6 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 1 ==9829== at 0x4021396: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149) ==9829== by 0x40304EC: _gfortrani_get_mem (memory.c:53) ==9829== by 0x80488FA: __configuration__validate_value (dump.f90:29) ==9829== by 0x8048A9A: MAIN__ (dump.f90:47) ==9829== by 0x8048AD6: main (fmain.c:18) ==9829== ==9829== LEAK SUMMARY: ==9829== definitely lost: 1,536 bytes in 6 blocks. ==9829== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. ==9829== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. ==9829== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. ==9829== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown. ==9829== To see them, rerun with: --show-reachable=yes -- Summary: memory leak in libgfortran Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: franke dot daniel at gmail dot com GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29101