public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/29206] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults [not found] <bug-29206-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2011-06-27 14:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-13 15:02 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ` (4 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-27 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206 Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|4.3.6 |4.4.7 --- Comment #18 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-27 12:14:17 UTC --- 4.3 branch is being closed, moving to 4.4.7 target. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults [not found] <bug-29206-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2011-06-27 14:36 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-13 15:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-13 17:20 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-13 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206 Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|4.4.7 |4.5.4 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-13 12:47:38 UTC --- 4.4 branch is being closed, moving to 4.5.4 target. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults [not found] <bug-29206-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2011-06-27 14:36 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-13 15:02 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-13 17:20 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-02 13:20 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.6/4.7/4.8 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-13 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206 Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #20 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-13 15:50:03 UTC --- Last known failure was reported against 4.2.0. Can somebody please confirm if this is still a problem on an active branch? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults [not found] <bug-29206-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2012-03-13 17:20 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-07-02 13:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-09 23:08 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-10 1:29 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net 5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-07-02 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206 Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|4.5.4 |4.6.4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults [not found] <bug-29206-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2012-07-02 13:20 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.6/4.7/4.8 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-09 23:08 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-10 1:29 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net 5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: steven at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-09 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206 Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC| |steven at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #21 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-09 23:07:43 UTC --- No response. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29206] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults [not found] <bug-29206-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2012-11-09 23:08 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-11-10 1:29 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net 5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: dave.anglin at bell dot net @ 2012-11-10 1:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206 --- Comment #22 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-10 01:28:52 UTC --- If possible, I think SJLJ support should go. I can't remember the exact status of SJLJ for HP-UX 10 but a comment in hpux-unwind.h suggests that I tested dwarf2 support. I can check but it will take time..... Dave -- John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-10 1:29 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <bug-29206-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2011-06-27 14:36 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-13 15:02 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-13 17:20 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-02 13:20 ` [Bug target/29206] [4.6/4.7/4.8 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-09 23:08 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-10 1:29 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).