From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-344485-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14497 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2011 08:53:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 14488 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jan 2011 08:53:19 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 08:53:15 +0000
From: "thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/29383] Fortran 2003/F95[TR15580:1999]: Floating point exception (IEEE) support
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-29383-4-AUHPA1gRzH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-29383-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-29383-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:41:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg02424.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29383

Thomas <thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |thenlich at users dot
                   |                            |sourceforge.net

--- Comment #5 from Thomas <thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net> 2011-01-24 08:53:10 UTC ---
Even a partial, incomplete support of module IEEE_ARITHMETIC would be very
useful and much appreciated:

>>From http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-11/msg00372.html

a) To set an IEEE value (NaN, INF, etc.)
b) Check whether a value is NaN, etc.

and IEEE_VALUE(X, IEEE_QUIET_NAN)

So we wouldn't have to resort to non-standard functions like ISNAN()
(http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/ISNAN.html) anymore.