From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-199139-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5959 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2006 12:52:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 5942 invoked by uid 48); 9 Oct 2006 12:52:29 -0000
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 12:52:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug target/29401]  New: [regression] missed-optimization (in unneeded code elimination)
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-29401-13382@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00700.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

Hi.

There is a regression on i386 platforms.


int f(int a, int b)
{return (((long long) a) * b) >> 15;}

The gcc 4.0/4.1 generates with "-O3 -fomit-frame-pointer"

        movl    8(%esp), %eax
        imull   4(%esp)
        shrdl   $15, %edx, %eax
        sarl    $15, %edx
        ret

While gcc-3.3/3.4 generates equal and faster

        movl    8(%esp), %eax
        imull   4(%esp)
        shrdl   $15, %edx, %eax
        ret


-- 
           Summary: [regression] missed-optimization (in unneeded code
                    elimination)
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: Petr dot Salinger at seznam dot cz
  GCC host triplet: i486


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29401