[Bug c/29467] -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic

[Bug c/29467] -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic

[manu at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29467

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |diagnostic
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-04-18
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-18 16:23:10 UTC ---
So? Is this a bug or not?

[Bug c/29467] -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic

[joseph at codesourcery dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29467

--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> 2012-04-23 21:22:38 UTC ---
I'd say it's a quality-of-implementation issue, but it probably would be 
best to diagnose this.  I've added such diagnostics for C11 keywords such 
as _Noreturn and _Static_assert outside C11 mode when adding support for 
those keywords, for example.

[Bug c/29467] -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic

[manu at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29467

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW

--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-23 21:47:30 UTC ---
So confirmed.

[Bug c/29467] -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic

[mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29467

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Potential fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg02015.html

[Bug c/29467] -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic

[mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29467

--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu May  1 07:21:07 2014
New Revision: 209971

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209971&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
    PR c/29467
    * c-decl.c (declspecs_add_type): Pedwarn if boolean types are used
    in C89 mode.

    * gcc.dg/pr29467.c: New test.
    * gcc.dg/declspec-13.c: Renumber some dg-warnings.  Add dg-warnings
    about boolean types.
    * gfortran.dg/bind_c_usage_24_c.c: Include <stdbool.h>.  Change _Bool
    to bool.
    * gfortran.dg/c_f_pointer_logical_driver.c: Change _Bool to bool.

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr29467.c
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/c/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/c/c-decl.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/declspec-13.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_usage_24_c.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_f_pointer_logical_driver.c

[Bug c/29467] -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic

[mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29467

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.

[Bug c/29467] -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic

[neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk]

------- Comment #2 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk  2006-10-14 16:19 -------
Subject: Re:  -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-

> 
> 
> ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-10-14 15:29 -------
> Hmm, isn't _Bool in the implemenation keyword space anyways?

It is, so is _Complex, and that is diagnosed.  I'm not saying it's
a conformance problem, just that it's probably a bug.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29467

Re: [Bug c/29467] -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic

[Neil Booth]

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-

> 
> 
> ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-10-14 15:29 -------
> Hmm, isn't _Bool in the implemenation keyword space anyways?

It is, so is _Complex, and that is diagnosed.  I'm not saying it's
a conformance problem, just that it's probably a bug.

[Bug c/29467] -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-10-14 15:29 -------
Hmm, isn't _Bool in the implemenation keyword space anyways?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29467