public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/29467] New: -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic
@ 2006-10-14 11:34 neil at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-14 15:29 ` [Bug c/29467] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-14 16:20 ` neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: neil at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-14 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
_Bool x;
--
Summary: -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: neil at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29467
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/29467] -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic
2006-10-14 11:34 [Bug c/29467] New: -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic neil at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-14 15:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-14 16:19 ` Neil Booth
2006-10-14 16:20 ` neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-14 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 15:29 -------
Hmm, isn't _Bool in the implemenation keyword space anyways?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29467
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug c/29467] -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic
2006-10-14 15:29 ` [Bug c/29467] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-14 16:19 ` Neil Booth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Neil Booth @ 2006-10-14 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org; +Cc: gcc-bugs
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
>
>
> ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 15:29 -------
> Hmm, isn't _Bool in the implemenation keyword space anyways?
It is, so is _Complex, and that is diagnosed. I'm not saying it's
a conformance problem, just that it's probably a bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/29467] -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic
2006-10-14 11:34 [Bug c/29467] New: -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic neil at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-14 15:29 ` [Bug c/29467] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-14 16:20 ` neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk @ 2006-10-14 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2006-10-14 16:19 -------
Subject: Re: -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
>
>
> ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 15:29 -------
> Hmm, isn't _Bool in the implemenation keyword space anyways?
It is, so is _Complex, and that is diagnosed. I'm not saying it's
a conformance problem, just that it's probably a bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29467
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-14 16:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-10-14 11:34 [Bug c/29467] New: -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic neil at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-14 15:29 ` [Bug c/29467] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-14 16:19 ` Neil Booth
2006-10-14 16:20 ` neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).