From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3665 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2012 21:38:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 3637 invoked by uid 48); 7 Nov 2012 21:37:50 -0000 From: "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/29845] sh floating point emulation is inefficient Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 21:38:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00656.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29845 --- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo 2012-11-07 21:3= 7:47 UTC --- J=C3=B6rn, I was curious whether the soft fpu code of yours is also available as C/C++= , or did you write it in asm only? I guess it would be an interesting bunch of = code quality tests for the compiler.