public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/29849] sh-linux uses inefficient multilib
[not found] <bug-29849-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2015-02-10 20:36 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-10 23:42 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-11 13:25 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-10 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29849
Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think we can close this PR as 'won't fix'.
I don't think sh-linux should be used as a shortcut for sh4-linux or something
like that. I guess by now everybody got used to the fact that for an SH4 Linux
things need to be configured as sh4-linux.
Kaz, what do you think?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29849] sh-linux uses inefficient multilib
[not found] <bug-29849-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-02-10 20:36 ` [Bug target/29849] sh-linux uses inefficient multilib olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-10 23:42 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-11 13:25 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-10 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29849
--- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #1)
> I think we can close this PR as 'won't fix'.
> I don't think sh-linux should be used as a shortcut for sh4-linux or
> something like that. I guess by now everybody got used to the fact that for
> an SH4 Linux things need to be configured as sh4-linux.
>
> Kaz, what do you think?
I totally agree with you.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29849] sh-linux uses inefficient multilib
[not found] <bug-29849-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-02-10 20:36 ` [Bug target/29849] sh-linux uses inefficient multilib olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-10 23:42 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-11 13:25 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-11 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29849
Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Closed as discussed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-11 13:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-29849-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-02-10 20:36 ` [Bug target/29849] sh-linux uses inefficient multilib olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-10 23:42 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-11 13:25 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).