public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/29849] sh-linux uses inefficient multilib [not found] <bug-29849-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2015-02-10 20:36 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-10 23:42 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-11 13:25 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-10 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29849 Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org, | |olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I think we can close this PR as 'won't fix'. I don't think sh-linux should be used as a shortcut for sh4-linux or something like that. I guess by now everybody got used to the fact that for an SH4 Linux things need to be configured as sh4-linux. Kaz, what do you think? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29849] sh-linux uses inefficient multilib [not found] <bug-29849-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2015-02-10 20:36 ` [Bug target/29849] sh-linux uses inefficient multilib olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-10 23:42 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-11 13:25 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-10 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29849 --- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #1) > I think we can close this PR as 'won't fix'. > I don't think sh-linux should be used as a shortcut for sh4-linux or > something like that. I guess by now everybody got used to the fact that for > an SH4 Linux things need to be configured as sh4-linux. > > Kaz, what do you think? I totally agree with you. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/29849] sh-linux uses inefficient multilib [not found] <bug-29849-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2015-02-10 20:36 ` [Bug target/29849] sh-linux uses inefficient multilib olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-10 23:42 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-11 13:25 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-11 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29849 Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Closed as discussed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-11 13:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-29849-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-02-10 20:36 ` [Bug target/29849] sh-linux uses inefficient multilib olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-10 23:42 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-11 13:25 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).