public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/29946]  New: inept unrolling for small iteration counts
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:47:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-29946-5394@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

When profile based feedback indicates that a loop has a low iteration
count, it will often refuse to unroll even though unrolling is still
useful.  Moreover, while it knows about the average loop iteration
count, it lacks the concept of a prevalent iteration count.

In particular, the header checksumming of the EEMBC packetflow benchmark
usually has ten iterations.  With gcc 3.x, unrolling was by a factor of four,
which was mediocre.  With the introduction of the new loop unroller in 4.0,
unrolling when doing profile feedback was no longer done at all.
The proper thing to do would be to unroll this loop five times.

When the case of a loop that is not a multiple of the chosen unroll factor is
deemed sufficiently unlikely, that case can be taken care of by generating
a non-unrolled loop after the unrolled loop.  The unrolled loop can use
a suitably transformed unequality check for the loop start and end to
verify that a sufficient number of iterations is outstanding, so that no
casesi / tablejump code is needed.

See also: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg02373.html


-- 
           Summary: inept unrolling for small iteration counts
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 29842
             nThis:


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29946


             reply	other threads:[~2006-11-22 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-22 19:47 amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2006-11-22 19:49 ` [Bug tree-optimization/29946] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-22 20:10 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-29946-5394@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).