public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "vadmium+gc at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/30006] Compound literal in structure initializer causes missing initializer warning to happen Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:25:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-30006-4-d3DawbLmVe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-30006-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006 Marty <vadmium+gc at gmail dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vadmium+gc at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from Marty <vadmium+gc at gmail dot com> 2012-04-18 12:22:48 UTC --- Possibly related: Bug 36446, Bug 47772 Here’s an example where the warning is completely false. There are no missing initialisers because I’ve listed them both. struct { struct { int first; int second; } inner; } outer = { .inner.first = 1, /* Warning -> */ .inner.second = 2, }; With the -Wextra flag, GCC 4.7.0 produced: bug.c:8:22: warning: missing initializer [-Wmissing-field-initializers] bug.c:8:22: warning: (near initialization for ‘outer.inner.second’) [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
next parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-18 12:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-30006-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2012-04-18 12:25 ` vadmium+gc at gmail dot com [this message] 2012-04-18 14:00 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2006-11-28 8:47 [Bug c/30006] New: Compound literal in structure initializer causes irrelevant warning yar at bsd dot chem dot msu dot ru 2006-12-02 8:10 ` [Bug c/30006] Compound literal in structure initializer causes missing initializer warning to happen pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-06 9:51 ` he at uninett dot no
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-30006-4-d3DawbLmVe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).