From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20535 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2006 06:22:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 20481 invoked by uid 48); 7 Dec 2006 06:22:16 -0000 Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 06:22:00 -0000 Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/30105] New: missed PRE X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Message-ID: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00564.txt.bz2 The following 2 functions should be compiled to the same assembly. This is one of Briggs' compiler benchmarks. void motion_test2(int *data) { int j; int i = 1; if (data[1]) { data[data[2]] = 2; j = data[0] + data[3]; i = i + j; } data[4] = data[0] + data[3]; data[5] = i; } void motion_result2(int *data) { int j; int i = 1; if (data[1]) { data[data[2]] = 2; j = data[0] + data[3]; i = i + j; } else j = data[0] + data[3]; data[4] = j; data[5] = i; } -- Summary: missed PRE Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30105