From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-204392-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5576 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2006 10:38:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 5550 invoked by uid 48); 7 Dec 2006 10:38:11 -0000
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 10:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug fortran/30107]  New: improve diagnostic of RECURSIVE LOGICAL SUBROUTINE
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-30107-13648@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00577.txt.bz2

The diagnostic of the code below is rather "generic". A more verbose message
would be preferable. Without RECURSIVE, gfortran gives "Error: Syntax error in
data declaration".

$> cat foo.f90
RECURSIVE LOGICAL SUBROUTINE foo()
END SUBROUTINE

$> gfortran-svn -c -Wall -g foo.f90
foo.f90:1:

RECURSIVE LOGICAL SUBROUTINE foo()
1
Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1)

$> gfortran-svn -v
gcc version 4.3.0 20061206 (experimental)


-- 
           Summary: improve diagnostic of RECURSIVE LOGICAL SUBROUTINE
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: diagnostic
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30107