public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "charles at rebelbase dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/30204] New: std::vector operator[] 10x speedup (patch) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:01:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-30204-13750@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) vector::operator[](size_type) in bits/stl_vector.h is currently implemented as reference operator[](size_type __n) { return *(begin() + __n); } const_reference operator[](size_type __n) const { return *(begin() + __n); } A faster implementation would be: reference operator[](size_type __n) { return _M_impl._M_start[__n]; } const_reference operator[](size_type __n) const { return _M_impl._M_start[__n]; } I tried a simple timing test on both implementations, and the latter appears to be 10x faster: (11:59:43)(charles xyzzy)(~): cat test.cc #include <vector> int main () { std::vector<int> x (100); unsigned long l = 0; const unsigned long iterations = 100000000; for (unsigned long i=0; i<iterations; ++i) l += x[50]; return 0; } (12:00:14)(charles xyzzy)(~): g++ -o test test.cc -lstdc++ (12:00:22)(charles xyzzy)(~): time ./test real 0m2.956s user 0m2.948s sys 0m0.008s (12:00:27)(charles xyzzy)(~): cat test2.cc #include <vector> int main () { std::vector<int> x (100); unsigned long l = 0; const unsigned long iterations = 100000000; for (unsigned long i=0; i<iterations; ++i) l += x._M_impl._M_start[50]; return 0; } (12:00:31)(charles xyzzy)(~): g++ -o test2 test2.cc -lstdc++ (12:00:39)(charles xyzzy)(~): time ./test2 real 0m0.228s user 0m0.228s sys 0m0.000s -- Summary: std::vector operator[] 10x speedup (patch) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: charles at rebelbase dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30204
next reply other threads:[~2006-12-13 18:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2006-12-13 18:01 charles at rebelbase dot com [this message] 2006-12-13 18:09 ` [Bug libstdc++/30204] " chris at bubblescope dot net 2006-12-14 2:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-14 10:34 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-12-14 11:20 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-12-14 17:58 ` charles at rebelbase dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-30204-13750@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).