public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/30250] New: Evaluate lgamma/gamma at compile-time
@ 2006-12-18 14:50 ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-24 3:33 ` [Bug middle-end/30250] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-12-18 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
We should use MPFR to evaluate c99 lgamma function (and the common extension
function gamma). However we have to wait until MPFR implements a suitable
interface as described here:
http://gforge.inria.fr/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php/trunk/TODO?root=mpfr&rev=4214&r1=4205&r2=4214
--
Summary: Evaluate lgamma/gamma at compile-time
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
BugsThisDependsOn: 29335
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/30250] Evaluate lgamma/gamma at compile-time
2006-12-18 14:50 [Bug middle-end/30250] New: Evaluate lgamma/gamma at compile-time ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-12-24 3:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-07 6:35 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-12-24 3:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-24 03:33 -------
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-12-24 03:33:42
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/30250] Evaluate lgamma/gamma at compile-time
2006-12-18 14:50 [Bug middle-end/30250] New: Evaluate lgamma/gamma at compile-time ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-24 3:33 ` [Bug middle-end/30250] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-05-07 6:35 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-10 7:14 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2007-05-19 4:18 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-05-07 6:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-07 07:35 -------
I'll be doing the reentrant lgamma_r/gamma_r versions as well. (They're
actually easier because I get the signgam identifer as a pointer parameter
rather than having to find it at global scope.)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/30250] Evaluate lgamma/gamma at compile-time
2006-12-18 14:50 [Bug middle-end/30250] New: Evaluate lgamma/gamma at compile-time ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-24 3:33 ` [Bug middle-end/30250] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-07 6:35 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-05-10 7:14 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2007-05-19 4:18 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: patchapp at dberlin dot org @ 2007-05-10 7:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-05-10 08:14 -------
Subject: Bug number PR middle-end/30250
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00619.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/30250] Evaluate lgamma/gamma at compile-time
2006-12-18 14:50 [Bug middle-end/30250] New: Evaluate lgamma/gamma at compile-time ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-05-10 7:14 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
@ 2007-05-19 4:18 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-05-19 4:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-19 05:18 -------
Subject: Bug 30250
Author: ghazi
Date: Sat May 19 04:18:05 2007
New Revision: 124849
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124849
Log:
PR middle-end/30250
* builtins.c (do_mpfr_lgamma_r): New.
(fold_builtin_2): Handle builtin gamma_r/lgamma_r.
* tree.h (CASE_FLT_FN_REENT): New.
testsuite:
* gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-2.c: Add gamma_r/lgamma_r tests.
* gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-4.c: Likewise.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/builtins.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-2.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-4.c
trunk/gcc/tree.h
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-19 4:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-12-18 14:50 [Bug middle-end/30250] New: Evaluate lgamma/gamma at compile-time ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-24 3:33 ` [Bug middle-end/30250] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-07 6:35 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-10 7:14 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2007-05-19 4:18 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).