public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/30352]  New: False error on INTENT(IN) when modifying pointees
@ 2007-01-02 10:08 anlauf at gmx dot de
  2007-01-08 22:06 ` [Bug fortran/30352] " anlauf at gmx dot de
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gmx dot de @ 2007-01-02 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Hi,

the following *legal Fortran 95* code is falsely rejected
by gfortran.  Note that this differs from PR 29624 which
specifies a F2003 feature for pointers.

% cat gfcbug52.f90
program gfcbug52
  implicit none

  type t
     integer, pointer :: p(:) => NULL ()
  end type t

  type(t) :: a

  allocate (a%p(1))
  call set (a)
  print *, a%p(1)

contains

  subroutine set (b)
    type(t), intent(in) :: b
    if (associated (b%p)) b%p(1) = 1
  end subroutine set

end program gfcbug52
% gfc gfcbug52.f90
gfcbug52.f90:18.27:

    if (associated (b%p)) b%p(1) = 1
                          1
Error: Can't assign to INTENT(IN) variable 'b' at (1)


-- 
           Summary: False error on INTENT(IN) when modifying pointees
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: anlauf at gmx dot de
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30352


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/30352] False error on INTENT(IN) when modifying pointees
  2007-01-02 10:08 [Bug fortran/30352] New: False error on INTENT(IN) when modifying pointees anlauf at gmx dot de
@ 2007-01-08 22:06 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
  2007-01-08 22:25 ` [Bug fortran/30352] [4.1, 4.2 only] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-01-14 21:41 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gmx dot de @ 2007-01-08 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from anlauf at gmx dot de  2007-01-08 22:06 -------
(In reply to comment #0)

It appears that the fix to PR 29624 also fixed this one
properly.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30352


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/30352] [4.1, 4.2 only] False error on INTENT(IN) when modifying pointees
  2007-01-02 10:08 [Bug fortran/30352] New: False error on INTENT(IN) when modifying pointees anlauf at gmx dot de
  2007-01-08 22:06 ` [Bug fortran/30352] " anlauf at gmx dot de
@ 2007-01-08 22:25 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-01-14 21:41 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-08 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-08 22:25 -------
> It appears that the fix to PR 29624 also fixed this one properly.
So far I had only managed to cause collateral damage not collateral fixes :-)


-- 

burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
           Keywords|                            |rejects-valid
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2007-01-08 22:25:46
               date|                            |
            Summary|False error on INTENT(IN)   |[4.1, 4.2 only] False error
                   |when modifying pointees     |on INTENT(IN) when modifying
                   |                            |pointees


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30352


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/30352] [4.1, 4.2 only] False error on INTENT(IN) when modifying pointees
  2007-01-02 10:08 [Bug fortran/30352] New: False error on INTENT(IN) when modifying pointees anlauf at gmx dot de
  2007-01-08 22:06 ` [Bug fortran/30352] " anlauf at gmx dot de
  2007-01-08 22:25 ` [Bug fortran/30352] [4.1, 4.2 only] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-14 21:41 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-14 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-14 21:41 -------
This is indeed fixed.

Paul


-- 

pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30352


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-14 21:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-01-02 10:08 [Bug fortran/30352] New: False error on INTENT(IN) when modifying pointees anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-01-08 22:06 ` [Bug fortran/30352] " anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-01-08 22:25 ` [Bug fortran/30352] [4.1, 4.2 only] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-14 21:41 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).