public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/30539] Accepts invalid explicit specialization declaration
       [not found] <bug-30539-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-01-03 16:08 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
  2012-01-03 19:11 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-01-03 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30539

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
                 CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-01-03 16:07:18 UTC ---
Fixed in 4.5.x.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/30539] Accepts invalid explicit specialization declaration
       [not found] <bug-30539-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2012-01-03 16:08 ` [Bug c++/30539] Accepts invalid explicit specialization declaration paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2012-01-03 19:11 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at gmail dot com @ 2012-01-03 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30539

--- Comment #3 from Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at gmail dot com> 2012-01-03 19:11:09 UTC ---
Excellent, and thanks! It's good to see that some of the 5+ year old reports
are still being closed on occasion :-)

(Although I have to say that this one was one of the more humorous, allowing
to write 
  template <> void X<1>::X<2>::X<3>::X<4>::f();
I'm almost going to miss that ;-)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/30539] Accepts invalid explicit specialization declaration
  2007-01-22  1:51 [Bug c++/30539] New: " bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2007-01-22 16:26 ` sebor at roguewave dot com
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: sebor at roguewave dot com @ 2007-01-22 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from sebor at roguewave dot com  2007-01-22 16:25 -------
Even better, this works too:

  template <> void X<1>::X<2>::X<3>::X<4>::f();


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30539


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-03 19:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-30539-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-03 16:08 ` [Bug c++/30539] Accepts invalid explicit specialization declaration paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-01-03 19:11 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
2007-01-22  1:51 [Bug c++/30539] New: " bangerth at dealii dot org
2007-01-22 16:26 ` [Bug c++/30539] " sebor at roguewave dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).