[Bug c++/30768] New: [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[Bug c++/30768] New: [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[hp at gcc dot gnu dot org]

For 121818 this test passed.
For 121819 (author of named revision CC:ed), I see:
Running
/tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp
...
...
FAIL: ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc (test for excess
errors)

with the message in libstdc++.log being:
/tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/cris-elf/gccobj/cris-elf/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pb_ds/detail/list_update_map_/insert_fn_imps.hpp:
In member function 'typename pb_ds::detail::lu_map_data_<Key, Mapped, Eq_Fn,
Allocator, Update_Policy>::entry_pointer pb_ds::detail::lu_map_data_<Key,
Mapped, Eq_Fn, Allocator, Update_Policy>::allocate_new_entry(typename
pb_ds::detail::types_traits<Key, Mapped, Allocator, false>::const_reference,
pb_ds::detail::false_type) [with Key = pb_ds::test::basic_type, Mapped =
pb_ds::test::basic_type, Eq_Fn = std::equal_to<pb_ds::test::basic_type>,
Allocator = __gnu_cxx::throw_allocator<pb_ds::test::basic_type>, Update_Policy
=
pb_ds::test::counter_lu_policy_t_<__gnu_cxx::throw_allocator<pb_ds::test::basic_type>,
5u>]':^M
/tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/cris-elf/gccobj/cris-elf/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pb_ds/detail/list_update_map_/insert_fn_imps.hpp:75:
internal compiler error: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:374^M
Please submit a full bug report,^M
with preprocessed source if appropriate.^M
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.^M

Preprocessed code coming up.


-- 
           Summary: [4.3 regression]: ICE in
                    ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
  GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: cris-axis-elf


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug c++/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #1 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-11 23:54 -------
I didn't see the bug in my native testing.  (I've just rechecked my test logs
to confirm that.)  Please post preprocessed source and command-line.

This is probably going to be a latent bug in the middle end, since my changes
did not directly impact the code that's crashing, but it's certainly plausible
that I tickled it, by adjusting what set of functions are marked TREE_NOTHROW.

Thanks,

-- Mark


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-12 00:00 -------
  /* This aborts e.g. when there is _no_ path from ENTRY to EXIT at all.  */
  gcc_assert (di->nodes == (unsigned int) n_basic_blocks - 1);


Sounds like inlining is messing up the CFG with slightly different NOTHROW.

Wll know once I see the preprocessed source.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
          Component|c++                         |middle-end


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[hp at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-12 00:22 -------
Created an attachment (id=13037)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13037&action=view)
Preprocessed and bzip2-compressed (3MeB uncompressed) code.

"cc1plus -O2" is sufficient.  Though -quit is recommended too. :)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[hp at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-12 00:23 -------
s/-quit/-quiet/ in last comment.


-- 

hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2007-02-12 00:23:11
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-12 00:54 -------
I can reproduce this on powerpc-darwin.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[hp at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-14 05:08 -------
Identical failure also seen for native x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu since at least
r121846 (presumably the same cause), so I'm a bit worried that it wasn't
noticed when 121819 was committed. It seems best to xfail for cris-* until this
PR gets attention - preprocessed test-case is in place so I guess it's as usual
just a matter of priorities.  Presumably patch reversion isn't on the table,
but it'd be nice to see this PR being assigned.  (Mark?)


-- 

hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 GCC target triplet|cris-axis-elf               |cris-axis-elf, x86_64-
                   |                            |unknown-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-14 05:14 -------
It's certainly my responsibility to fix it.  

Personally, I don't think it's necessary to revert it, and I will try to get to
it soon, but if it's getting in other people's way, then we could potentially
revert.  As I mentioned upthread, I didn't see the test fail, but presumably
that's either me being a moron, or some environmental difference.

Keep after me about it.


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |mark at codesourcery dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[hp at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-14 20:15 -------
Subject: Bug 30768

Author: hp
Date: Wed Feb 14 20:15:29 2007
New Revision: 121959

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121959
Log:
        PR middle-end/30768
        * testsuite/ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc:
        Xfail ICE for cris-*-*.

Modified:
    trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
   
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-14 22:31 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
>         PR middle-end/30768
>         * testsuite/ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc:
>         Xfail ICE for cris-*-*.

You really should not have xfail'd an ICE that just showed up.  It is not like
4.3 is in a release branch yet so the testresults should show we have a
regression still.  Otherwise we look at the testresults and say the target is
good to go when it is not really because there is a regression which we cannot
see right off the bat.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-14 23:21 -------
I have reproduced this with the attached .ii file and a cross-compiler to
cris-axis-elf.  The problematic function is allocate_new_entry.

I believe that the problem is that the dom2 pass eliminates basic blocks,
without updating n_basic_blocks.

In particular, looking at allocae_new_entry in 067t.copyrename3, I see 14 basic
blocks for allocate_new_entry.  In contrast, in 68t.dom2, I see 12.  When the
apply_inline pass runs later, it trips on the assert because it finds only 12
basic blocks -- but n_basic_blocks is 14.

Diego, is this something that you might be able to help with?  I'm not eager to
go tearing through dom trying to work this out, though I will if necessary, of
course...


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dnovillo at redhat dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #11 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-14 23:54 -------
(In reply to comment #10)

> Diego, is this something that you might be able to help with?
> 
Sure.


-- 

dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|dnovillo at redhat dot com  |
         AssignedTo|mark at codesourcery dot com|dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[mark at codesourcery dot com]

------- Comment #12 from mark at codesourcery dot com  2007-02-14 23:56 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.3 regression]: ICE in
ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #11 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-14 23:54 -------
> (In reply to comment #10)
> 
>> Diego, is this something that you might be able to help with?
>>
> Sure.

Thanks!  Let me know if you get sick of it and want to punt it back. :-)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #13 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-15 00:10 -------

I think just adding a bugzilla report about this, and not adding in an explicit
XFAIL, would have been sufficient. It's no biggie, however.

FYI it looks like solaris is also tripping over this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-02/msg00528.html

HP, if you posted testresults to gcc-testresults for cris-elf, we could just
put in a link for your testresults too! Also, other people could notice this
without you even having to point it out...

-benjamin


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #14 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-15 00:13 -------

And HPUX
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-02/msg00543.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #15 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-15 00:13 -------

And SH4
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-02/msg00544.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[hp at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #16 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-15 01:31 -------
Sorry I've forgotten to post test-results.
Applying contrib/test_summary -t to the result of Geoff's btest-gcc.sh yielded,
as of r121948,
<URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-02/msg00550.html>
before the xfail was applied.  (Hope to send results at least on weekdays.)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[hp at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #17 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-15 01:39 -------
My arguments so far for xfailing are at
<URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01281.html>.
People having concerns about xfailing tests, please vent them there or at gcc@.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-15 12:41 -------
It triggers on the c++tester (x86_64) for boost and tramp3d as well.  Can we
please fix this asap?  Thanks.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |critical
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Comment #19 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2007-02-15 16:06 -------
Also, I don't think the XFAIL-ing has been implemented in the correct way. We
are now seeing logs like:

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-02/msg00570.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[hp at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #20 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-15 21:43 -------
In reply to comment #19, it's because the dg-bogus test trigs for that target;
it hits the ICE.  As Mark didn't see the fail when testing, and noone else
complained, I originally thought only cris-*-* and perhaps one or two other
targets were affected, but it seems rather universal.  The dg-bogus lines
aren't target-specific; there'd have to be both a "target" and "xfail" for that
to work, and you can only have either one of them.

If you insist that you want to see just the single "original" FAIL for "excess
errors" (with has no further explanation or the note of an open PR it has now),
I can change the test to just be skipped for cris-*-* and you'll see no change
for other targets compared to when the ICE first appeared, as in this PR's
"Description".  Alternatives would be to add targets to the xfail list or
remove it (defaulting to *-*-*) or change to { target { ! <list> } }, but that
can quickly get messy.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #21 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-16 01:49 -------
I am still reducing this source.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Comment #22 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2007-02-16 09:06 -------
Frankly, I think it would make sense to remove completely this XFAIL-ing mess
and just wait for Diego to fix the compiler issue.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #23 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-16 12:35 -------
(In reply to comment #22)
> Frankly, I think it would make sense to remove completely this XFAIL-ing mess
> and just wait for Diego to fix the compiler issue.
> 
Agreed. I don't understand why the rush to XFAIL a test that's obviously
exposing a bug. At most, I would like to understand which patch started
triggering the failure. It can't have been too long ago, the 2-3 day old
mainline tree I have in my box does not have this failure.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #24 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-16 14:26 -------
Subject: Bug 30768

Author: paolo
Date: Fri Feb 16 14:26:21 2007
New Revision: 122044

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122044
Log:
2007-02-16  Paolo Carlini  <pcarlini@suse.de>

        Revert.
        2007-02-14  Hans-Peter Nilsson  <hp@axis.com>

        PR middle-end/30768
        * testsuite/ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc:
        Xfail ICE for cris-*-*.

Modified:
    trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
   
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Comment #25 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2007-02-16 14:28 -------
Ok, just reverted the XFAILing. I think Andrew Pinski is already working on
reducing the testcase, in case we can also ask Janis to do a binary search.


-- 

pcarlini at suse dot de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pcarlini at suse dot de


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[hp at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #26 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-16 17:01 -------
Paolo Carlini, why did you revert the xfail?  That's *not* according to
procedure.
I really resent that, but please discuss the issue on the gcc@ or gcc-patches@
lists, not here.  If it was the extra FAIL lines for ICEing targets, I now know
how to limit the xfail using dg-xfail-if.
I also don't see any message on gcc-patches@ or libstdc++@ about the reversion.
Regarding binary search, I suggest you read the description of this PR.
The revision exposing the bug is already identified.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Comment #27 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2007-02-16 17:04 -------
(In reply to comment #26)
> Paolo Carlini, why did you revert the xfail?  That's *not* according to
> procedure.

You can resent whatever you want, but I'm maintaining the library and both
Benjamin (another maintainer) and Diego are with me. Therefore the discussion
ends together with the unnecessary noise your commit produced.

> The revision exposing the bug is already identified.

Excellent. 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #28 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-18 23:28 -------
I think this is honza's bug.  The backtrace:
#0  fancy_abort (file=0xda66cc "../../gcc/dominance.c", line=374,
function=0xda66e4 "calc_dfs_tree") at ../../gcc/diagnostic.c:642
#1  0x0077eba8 in calc_dfs_tree (di=0xbffff0b0, reverse=CDI_DOMINATORS) at
../../gcc/dominance.c:374
#2  0x0077f9f4 in calculate_dominance_info (dir=CDI_DOMINATORS) at
../../gcc/dominance.c:632
#3  0x0080808c in update_ssa (update_flags=1024) at
../../gcc/tree-into-ssa.c:3155
#4  0x00331078 in tree_function_versioning (old_decl=0x1114e00,
new_decl=0x1408180, tree_map=0x0, update_clones=1 '\001') at
../../gcc/tree-inline.c:3455
#5  0x00711148 in save_inline_function_body (node=0x11a0e00) at
../../gcc/cgraphunit.c:1562
#6  0x004756b4 in apply_inline () at ../../gcc/ipa-inline.c:1563
#7  0x004b78f4 in execute_one_pass (pass=0xe9756c) at ../../gcc/passes.c:1055


Looks up inlining is messing up after all.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #29 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-18 23:30 -------
Created an attachment (id=13068)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13068&action=view)
Reduced testcase as far as I can reduce it

This is the most reduced testcase I can get it.  it is down to 39k.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #13037|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #30 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-23 00:07 -------
I think this is really a duplicate of bug 30509 which has a nice short
testcase.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |30509


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #31 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-25 17:42 -------
Yes this is a dup as the patch which honza added to that bug fixes this one
also.  Plus there is a small testcase.  So closing as a dup.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30509 ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768