public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/30985] New: Misleading error message for -huge(integer)-1
@ 2007-02-27 20:23 burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-27 20:49 ` [Bug fortran/30985] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-27 21:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-27 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
If one inputs a variable which is (-huge(i)-1), gfortran outputs:
i = -2147483648
1
Error: Integer too big for its kind at (1)
This can be very irritating as the number is representable hardware wise, even
if it is not a Fortran number (symmetrically around the zero).
I had a program, which didn't work (PR30981) and thus I used "print *, i"
which showed: -2147483648. It is then very counterintuitive that one cannot
enter the number directly.
Maybe a more explicit error message should be given for (-huge(i)-1). In
addition, maybe one could point to "-fno-range-check"? I know we don't point to
compiler options in error messages so far, but for this case it might make
sense. (Analogously for
data x/too-big-BOZ, overflowing on purpose/.)
[For some errors, I'd also like to see a pointer to -std=legacy as I often
don't realize that it is allowed there.]
--
Summary: Misleading error message for -huge(integer)-1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30985
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/30985] Misleading error message for -huge(integer)-1
2007-02-27 20:23 [Bug fortran/30985] New: Misleading error message for -huge(integer)-1 burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-02-27 20:49 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-27 21:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-27 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-27 20:49 -------
This is a bogus PR. The are no negative numbers.
This is a unary minus operation and 2147483648
is too big for INTEGER(4). The only method to
get the most negative value is -HUGE() - 1.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30985
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/30985] Misleading error message for -huge(integer)-1
2007-02-27 20:23 [Bug fortran/30985] New: Misleading error message for -huge(integer)-1 burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-27 20:49 ` [Bug fortran/30985] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-02-27 21:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-27 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-27 21:50 -------
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 29580 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30985
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-27 21:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-02-27 20:23 [Bug fortran/30985] New: Misleading error message for -huge(integer)-1 burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-27 20:49 ` [Bug fortran/30985] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-27 21:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).