public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/31059] bounds-check does not detect nonconforming assignment arrays Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 20:53:42 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-31059-4-rix9Kpc8Z4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-31059-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31059 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 55821 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55821&action=edit Partial patch (proof of concept) The attached patch adds bounds-checking for the case that the r.h.s. has only an array constructor. Note the the original testcase is bogus, as it does not prevent (re)allocation on assignment, which became default in F2003. Adjusted testcase: program p integer :: jvec(3) = [1,2,3] integer, allocatable :: ivec(:) allocate (ivec(2)) ivec(:) = [4,5,6] ! shall be detected ivec(:) = jvec ! already detected end
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-30 20:53 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-31059-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2010-12-29 15:23 ` [Bug fortran/31059] Detect nonconforming assignment of allocatable arrays dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-29 15:24 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-30 20:53 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-08-31 20:15 ` [Bug fortran/31059] bounds-check does not detect nonconforming assignment arrays anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-31 20:44 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-09-01 20:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-31059-4-rix9Kpc8Z4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).