From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-212980-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19883 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2007 14:12:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 19849 invoked by uid 48); 13 Mar 2007 14:12:24 -0000
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:12:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug fortran/31162]  New: missing warning for real do-loops with implicit typed variables
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-31162-9562@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "manfred99 at gmx dot ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg01178.txt.bz2

real r
      do r=1.0,2.0
        print*,r
      enddo
      end

gives
legacy.f:2.10:

      do r=1.0,2.0
         1
Warning: Obsolete: REAL DO loop iterator at (1)


which is ok, however
      do r=1.0,2.0
        print*,r
      enddo
      end
compiles without warning!

the same for
      implicit real(a-z)
      do r=1.0,2.0
        print*,r
      enddo
      end

Additionally: It seems this warning is tied to -std=legacy, perhaps
it would make more sense to tie it to -Wsurprising as it was the case for g77.


-- 
           Summary: missing warning for real do-loops with implicit typed
                    variables
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: manfred99 at gmx dot ch


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31162