public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libfortran/31335] Calls lstat(), stat() and fstat() in libgfortran should be protected by autoconf HAVE_{L,,F}STAT macros
  2007-03-24 11:02 [Bug libfortran/31335] New: Calls lstat(), stat() and fstat() in libgfortran should be protected by autoconf HAVE_{L,,F}STAT macros fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-03-24 11:02 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-03-24 15:25 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-03-24 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2007-03-24 11:02:38
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31335


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libfortran/31335]  New: Calls lstat(), stat() and fstat() in libgfortran should be protected by autoconf HAVE_{L,,F}STAT macros
@ 2007-03-24 11:02 fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-03-24 11:02 ` [Bug libfortran/31335] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-03-24 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

In libgfortran/intrinsics/stat.c, we unconditionally issue calls to stat(),
fstat() and lstat(). This is wrong, and these calls should be protected by
HAVE_{,F,L}STAT macros, themselves defined by autoconf.

This bug is annoying especially for lstat(), because it's non-POSIX and it's
not present on mingw; this, in turns, prevent us from creating a DLL
libgfortran (when the recent libtool patch by Steve Ellcey will be commited, it
will be the only bug still preventing this!). In the lstat() case, when lstat()
is not available and stat() is available, we should use it instead.

PS: We already have a test HAVE_WORKING_STAT that is used by the I/O system to
see if the system stat implementation fits the needs of the I/O code, but this
is unrelated.


-- 
           Summary: Calls lstat(), stat() and fstat() in libgfortran should
                    be protected by autoconf HAVE_{L,,F}STAT macros
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libfortran
        AssignedTo: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31335


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libfortran/31335] Calls lstat(), stat() and fstat() in libgfortran should be protected by autoconf HAVE_{L,,F}STAT macros
  2007-03-24 11:02 [Bug libfortran/31335] New: Calls lstat(), stat() and fstat() in libgfortran should be protected by autoconf HAVE_{L,,F}STAT macros fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-03-24 11:02 ` [Bug libfortran/31335] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-03-24 15:25 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-03-25  9:12 ` dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-03-24 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                URL|                            |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
                   |                            |patches/2007-
                   |                            |03/msg01605.html
           Keywords|                            |patch
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31335


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libfortran/31335] Calls lstat(), stat() and fstat() in libgfortran should be protected by autoconf HAVE_{L,,F}STAT macros
  2007-03-24 11:02 [Bug libfortran/31335] New: Calls lstat(), stat() and fstat() in libgfortran should be protected by autoconf HAVE_{L,,F}STAT macros fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-03-24 11:02 ` [Bug libfortran/31335] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-03-24 15:25 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-03-25  9:12 ` dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
  2007-03-25  9:20 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net @ 2007-03-25  9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net  2007-03-25 11:12 -------
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-10/msg00583.html
Danny


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31335


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libfortran/31335] Calls lstat(), stat() and fstat() in libgfortran should be protected by autoconf HAVE_{L,,F}STAT macros
  2007-03-24 11:02 [Bug libfortran/31335] New: Calls lstat(), stat() and fstat() in libgfortran should be protected by autoconf HAVE_{L,,F}STAT macros fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-03-25  9:12 ` dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
@ 2007-03-25  9:20 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-03-31 19:41 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-03-25  9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-03-25 11:19 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-10/msg00583.html

Yes, thanks, I know. I followed in my patch
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg01605.html) the idea I already
had at that time: if lstat() is not available, instead of not providing the
library function for LTAT, we'll use stat().


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31335


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libfortran/31335] Calls lstat(), stat() and fstat() in libgfortran should be protected by autoconf HAVE_{L,,F}STAT macros
  2007-03-24 11:02 [Bug libfortran/31335] New: Calls lstat(), stat() and fstat() in libgfortran should be protected by autoconf HAVE_{L,,F}STAT macros fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-03-25  9:20 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-03-31 19:41 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-03-31 19:42 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-04-13 19:56 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-03-31 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-03-31 20:41 -------
Subject: Bug 31335

Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat Mar 31 20:41:11 2007
New Revision: 123388

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123388
Log:
        PR libfortran/31335
        * intrinsics/stat.c: Only provide STAT and FSTAT library routines
        if stat() and fstat() library functions are available. When lstat()
        is not available, use stat() instead.
        * configure.ac: Add checks for stat, fstat and lstat.
        * configure: Regenerate.
        * config.h.in: Regenerate.

Modified:
    trunk/libgfortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/libgfortran/config.h.in
    trunk/libgfortran/configure
    trunk/libgfortran/configure.ac
    trunk/libgfortran/intrinsics/stat.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31335


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libfortran/31335] Calls lstat(), stat() and fstat() in libgfortran should be protected by autoconf HAVE_{L,,F}STAT macros
  2007-03-24 11:02 [Bug libfortran/31335] New: Calls lstat(), stat() and fstat() in libgfortran should be protected by autoconf HAVE_{L,,F}STAT macros fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-03-31 19:41 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-03-31 19:42 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-04-13 19:56 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-03-31 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-03-31 20:42 -------
Fixed on 4.3.


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31335


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libfortran/31335] Calls lstat(), stat() and fstat() in libgfortran should be protected by autoconf HAVE_{L,,F}STAT macros
  2007-03-24 11:02 [Bug libfortran/31335] New: Calls lstat(), stat() and fstat() in libgfortran should be protected by autoconf HAVE_{L,,F}STAT macros fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-03-31 19:42 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-04-13 19:56 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-04-13 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-04-13 20:56 -------
Subject: Bug 31335

Author: fxcoudert
Date: Fri Apr 13 20:56:19 2007
New Revision: 123796

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123796
Log:
        PR libfortran/31335

        * intrinsics/stat.c: Only provide STAT and FSTAT library routines
        if stat() and fstat() library functions are available. When lstat()
        is not available, use stat() instead.
        * configure.ac: Add checks for stat, fstat and lstat.
        * configure: Regenerate.
        * config.h.in: Regenerate.

Modified:
    branches/gcc-4_2-branch/libgfortran/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-4_2-branch/libgfortran/config.h.in
    branches/gcc-4_2-branch/libgfortran/configure
    branches/gcc-4_2-branch/libgfortran/configure.ac
    branches/gcc-4_2-branch/libgfortran/intrinsics/stat.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31335


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-04-13 19:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-03-24 11:02 [Bug libfortran/31335] New: Calls lstat(), stat() and fstat() in libgfortran should be protected by autoconf HAVE_{L,,F}STAT macros fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-24 11:02 ` [Bug libfortran/31335] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-24 15:25 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-25  9:12 ` dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
2007-03-25  9:20 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-31 19:41 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-31 19:42 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-13 19:56 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).