From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-214802-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21211 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2007 19:47:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 21169 invoked by uid 48); 2 Apr 2007 19:47:17 -0000
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 19:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug c++/31436]  New: [4.3 regression] ICE with invalid use of parameter pack in function arg
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-31436-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2

More fallout from the variadic templates on mainline:

===========================================================
template<typename... T> int foo(const T&)
{
  union { T t; };
  return t;
}

void bar()
{
  foo(0);
}
===========================================================

bug.cc:1: error: parameter packs not expanded with `...':
bug.cc:1: note:         'T'
bug.cc: In function 'int foo(const T&) [with T = <expression error>]':
bug.cc:9:   instantiated from here
bug.cc:4: internal compiler error: tree check: expected record_type or
union_type or qual_union_type, have template_type_parm in lookup_conversions,
at cp/search.c:2432
Please submit a full bug report, [etc.]

Similar to PR31434 and PR31435 as this is also invalid use of a
parameter pack in a function argument.


-- 
           Summary: [4.3 regression] ICE with invalid use of parameter pack
                    in function arg
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, error-recovery, monitored
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31436