public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/31495] New: Is this continuation line legal?
@ 2007-04-06 17:31 michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
2007-04-06 18:32 ` [Bug fortran/31495] " jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov @ 2007-04-06 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
When I compile the program listed below I get the message:
Warning: '&' not allowed by itself in line 4
The other compilers I tried do not print any messages.
PROGRAM print_ascertain
CHARACTER (LEN=20) :: str
str = "Hello world &
& &
&"
END PROGRAM print_ascertain
--
Summary: Is this continuation line legal?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31495
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/31495] Is this continuation line legal?
2007-04-06 17:31 [Bug fortran/31495] New: Is this continuation line legal? michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
@ 2007-04-06 18:32 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-06 19:19 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-04-06 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-06 19:32 -------
Confirmed: The relevant section in the standard is 3.3.1.3 . This diallows a
single '&' by it self on a line, but says nothing about two. Part of th
eproblem is we treat ' ' (a blank) as non printable in the scanner.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-04-06 19:32:47
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31495
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/31495] Is this continuation line legal?
2007-04-06 17:31 [Bug fortran/31495] New: Is this continuation line legal? michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
2007-04-06 18:32 ` [Bug fortran/31495] " jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-04-06 19:19 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-21 21:25 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-04-06 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-06 20:18 -------
Index: scanner.c
===================================================================
--- scanner.c (revision 123528)
Here is a preliminary patch, I a, testing some combinations so the final patch
may vary from this a bit.
+++ scanner.c (working copy)
@@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@ load_line (FILE *input, char **pbuf, int
if (c == '&')
seen_ampersand = 1;
- if ((c != ' ' && c != '&' && c != '!') || (c == '!' && !seen_ampersand))
+ if ((c != '&' && c != '!') || (c == '!' && !seen_ampersand))
seen_printable = 1;
if (gfc_current_form == FORM_FREE
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31495
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/31495] Is this continuation line legal?
2007-04-06 17:31 [Bug fortran/31495] New: Is this continuation line legal? michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
2007-04-06 18:32 ` [Bug fortran/31495] " jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-06 19:19 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-04-21 21:25 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2007-04-21 21:34 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: patchapp at dberlin dot org @ 2007-04-21 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-04-21 22:25 -------
Subject: Bug number PR31495
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg01357.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31495
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/31495] Is this continuation line legal?
2007-04-06 17:31 [Bug fortran/31495] New: Is this continuation line legal? michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-04-21 21:25 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
@ 2007-04-21 21:34 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-21 21:35 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-04-21 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-21 22:34 -------
Subject: Bug 31495
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr 21 22:34:04 2007
New Revision: 124022
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124022
Log:
2007-04-21 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/31495
* scanner.c (load_line): Remove check for comment after ampersand and
adjust tracking of ampersand.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/scanner.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31495
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/31495] Is this continuation line legal?
2007-04-06 17:31 [Bug fortran/31495] New: Is this continuation line legal? michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2007-04-21 21:34 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-04-21 21:35 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-21 22:01 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-29 8:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-04-21 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-21 22:35 -------
Fixed on trunk, closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31495
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/31495] Is this continuation line legal?
2007-04-06 17:31 [Bug fortran/31495] New: Is this continuation line legal? michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2007-04-21 21:35 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-04-21 22:01 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-29 8:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-04-21 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-21 23:00 -------
Subject: Bug 31495
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr 21 23:00:38 2007
New Revision: 124026
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124026
Log:
2007-04-21 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/31495
* gfortran.dg/continuation_8.f90: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation_8.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31495
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/31495] Is this continuation line legal?
2007-04-06 17:31 [Bug fortran/31495] New: Is this continuation line legal? michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2007-04-21 22:01 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-05-29 8:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-05-29 8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-29 08:05 -------
*** Bug 32138 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mathewc at nag dot co dot uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31495
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-29 8:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-04-06 17:31 [Bug fortran/31495] New: Is this continuation line legal? michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov
2007-04-06 18:32 ` [Bug fortran/31495] " jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-06 19:19 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-21 21:25 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2007-04-21 21:34 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-21 21:35 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-21 22:01 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-29 8:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).