public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/31601] RFC: legacy-only allowed: State that code is allowed with -std=legacy ?
[not found] <bug-31601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2014-01-12 18:34 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-08-29 13:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2014-01-12 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31601
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> Examples:
> "Integer too big for its kind at %C" -> "Integer too big for its kind at %C.
> Use -fno-range-check to disable this check"
One now gets
This check can be disabled with the option -fno-range-check
since at least 4.3.1.
> "Duplicate PROTECTED attribute specified at %L" -> "Duplicate PROTECTED
> attribute specified at %L. Use -std=legacy to disable this check"
From
if (!gfc_notify_std (GFC_STD_LEGACY,
"Duplicate PROTECTED attribute specified at %L",
where))
this has not yet been implemented. If this deemed of any relevance, this is the
kind of fix I can handle, otherwise this PR can be closed as WONTFIX. It would
help me if a test case already exists, but I can do without it.
Last question, are there other cases one can think of?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/31601] RFC: legacy-only allowed: State that code is allowed with -std=legacy ?
[not found] <bug-31601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-01-12 18:34 ` [Bug fortran/31601] RFC: legacy-only allowed: State that code is allowed with -std=legacy ? dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2015-08-29 13:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2015-08-29 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31601
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
No answer to comment 1 since over a year and a half! Closing as WONTFIX.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/31601] RFC: legacy-only allowed: State that code is allowed with -std=legacy ?
2007-04-17 12:20 [Bug fortran/31601] New: " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-04-17 13:05 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-04-17 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-04-17 14:05:03
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31601
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-08-29 13:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-31601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-01-12 18:34 ` [Bug fortran/31601] RFC: legacy-only allowed: State that code is allowed with -std=legacy ? dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-08-29 13:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2007-04-17 12:20 [Bug fortran/31601] New: " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-17 13:05 ` [Bug fortran/31601] " tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).