* [Bug target/31782] Invalid assembly code on initial dollar signs
[not found] <bug-31782-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-02-04 16:42 ` funto66 at gmail dot com
2014-06-22 8:42 ` raphael.jakse at gmail dot com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: funto66 at gmail dot com @ 2011-02-04 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
funto66 at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |funto66 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from funto66 at gmail dot com 2011-02-04 16:42:33 UTC ---
I think this is the same bug that I got :
- this code compiles :
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
int $a = 0;
for($a = 0 ; $a < 10 ; $a++)
printf("%d\n", $a);
return 0;
}
- this one doesn't :
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
static const char* $tr = "Hello World !\n";
int i=0;
for(;$tr[i] != '\0' ; i++)
fputc($tr[i], stdout);
return 0;
}
Version used: gcc version 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31782] Invalid assembly code on initial dollar signs
[not found] <bug-31782-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-02-04 16:42 ` [Bug target/31782] Invalid assembly code on initial dollar signs funto66 at gmail dot com
@ 2014-06-22 8:42 ` raphael.jakse at gmail dot com
2014-06-22 11:27 ` harald at gigawatt dot nl
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: raphael.jakse at gmail dot com @ 2014-06-22 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
Raphaël JAKSE <raphael.jakse at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |raphael.jakse at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from Raphaël JAKSE <raphael.jakse at gmail dot com> ---
New information on this bug:
With gcc version 4.8.3-3 on Debian x86-64 targeting x86_64-linux-gnu, trying to
get the assembly version of the following code with gcc -S:
void $() {}
void a() { $(); }
I get:
[...]
call $
[...]
With clang, I get:
[...]
callq ($)
[...]
Making the corresponding object file of this code with gcc -c
- succeed with the assembly code generated by clang
- fails with the assembly code generated by gcc with the following message:
t.c: Assembler messages:
t.c:30: Error: missing or invalid immediate expression `'
Adding parentheses in the assembly code generated by gcc:
call $ → call ($)
make the object file generation succeed.
Clang seems to add parentheses whenever the function name starts with a dollar
sign ($).
>From gcc-bugs-return-454660-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Jun 22 09:17:53 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-454660-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9904 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2014 09:17:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9772 invoked by uid 55); 22 Jun 2014 09:17:15 -0000
From: "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/61503] RTL representation of i386 shrdl instruction is incorrect?
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 09:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61503-4-jU4fek1aN7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61503-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61503-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg01742.txt.bz2
Content-length: 506
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ida503
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: glisse
Date: Sun Jun 22 09:16:35 2014
New Revision: 211873
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev!1873&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-22 Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>
PR target/61503
* config/i386/i386.md (x86_64_shrd, x86_shrd,
ix86_rotr<dwi>3_doubleword): Replace ashiftrt with lshiftrt.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31782] Invalid assembly code on initial dollar signs
[not found] <bug-31782-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-02-04 16:42 ` [Bug target/31782] Invalid assembly code on initial dollar signs funto66 at gmail dot com
2014-06-22 8:42 ` raphael.jakse at gmail dot com
@ 2014-06-22 11:27 ` harald at gigawatt dot nl
2014-06-23 7:25 ` raphael.jakse at gmail dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: harald at gigawatt dot nl @ 2014-06-22 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
--- Comment #7 from Harald van Dijk <harald at gigawatt dot nl> ---
That's good to know. Trying some more, clang does manage to get even weirder
symbol names right, because gas does have a form of quoting already, and clang
makes use of it.
int x __asm__(")");
int main() { return x; }
With clang, this works.
...
movl ")", %eax
...
.type ")",@object # @")"
.comm ")",4,4
...
If it's simpler to implement, then instead of parenthesising, $ could
alternatively be treated as a symbol that needs quoting, which is a more
general solution that will work for any possible symbol name.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31782] Invalid assembly code on initial dollar signs
[not found] <bug-31782-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-22 11:27 ` harald at gigawatt dot nl
@ 2014-06-23 7:25 ` raphael.jakse at gmail dot com
2014-06-23 21:36 ` harald at gigawatt dot nl
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: raphael.jakse at gmail dot com @ 2014-06-23 7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
--- Comment #8 from Raphaël JAKSE <raphael.jakse at gmail dot com> ---
I tried
call "$"
instead of
call ($)
With gcc -S, I got :
t.s: Assembler messages:
t.s:30: Error: invalid character `"' before operand 1
I don't know if there is a way to use quoting (" ") instead of parenthesizing).
>From gcc-bugs-return-454674-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Jun 23 07:28:17 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-454674-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6917 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2014 07:28:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6892 invoked by uid 48); 23 Jun 2014 07:28:14 -0000
From: "potswa at mac dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/61584] What defines std::underlying_type?
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 07:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: potswa at mac dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61584-4-6wAbpoPcb1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61584-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61584-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg01756.txt.bz2
Content-length: 595
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61584
--- Comment #2 from David Krauss <potswa at mac dot com> ---
C "compatible type" determines integer conversion rank (C11 §6.3.1.1). C++
fixes the rank by a heuristic which the implementation cannot decide (C++11
§4.5/3).
Currently, enum promotions are incompatible between C and C++ modes.
Furthermore, when C++ requires promotion to signed int but the underlying type
is unsigned int, integer overflow may occur.
I think this adds up to a bug and the C++ behavior should get its own bullet at
the end of that manual page.
>From gcc-bugs-return-454675-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Jun 23 07:35:32 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-454675-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14235 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2014 07:35:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14183 invoked by uid 48); 23 Jun 2014 07:35:28 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/61583] [4.9/4.10 regression] stage2 and stage3 compare failure due to value range loss
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 07:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: amodra at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-61583-4-gp9nQWacEH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61583-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61583-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg01757.txt.bz2
Content-length: 484
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ida583
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Preapproved with proper ChangeLog entry and if possible some testcase (with
-fcompare-debug in dg-options).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31782] Invalid assembly code on initial dollar signs
[not found] <bug-31782-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-23 7:25 ` raphael.jakse at gmail dot com
@ 2014-06-23 21:36 ` harald at gigawatt dot nl
2014-06-24 7:37 ` raphael.jakse at gmail dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: harald at gigawatt dot nl @ 2014-06-23 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
--- Comment #9 from Harald van Dijk <harald at gigawatt dot nl> ---
Oh, very sorry about that, I hadn't realised clang stopped using gas. clang
uses its own assembler now, which supports quoted names this as a syntax
extension. Now that there is a possible syntax already, perhaps that will be
easier to bring to gas.
gas does indeed seem to properly handle your suggestion of parenthesised
identifiers on x86-64 already, even if they have names such as $0 (unlike
clang's assembler, oddly). However, I do worry that this may be too brittle,
because of other systems (even using gas) where $ is used more extensively in
standard syntax, such as register names, where parentheses cannot be used to
force interpretation as a symbol name because register names may also be
parenthesised.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31782] Invalid assembly code on initial dollar signs
[not found] <bug-31782-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-23 21:36 ` harald at gigawatt dot nl
@ 2014-06-24 7:37 ` raphael.jakse at gmail dot com
2021-07-29 23:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: raphael.jakse at gmail dot com @ 2014-06-24 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
--- Comment #10 from Raphaël JAKSE <raphael.jakse at gmail dot com> ---
So, a long term solution would be to allow quoted function names with the call
instruction in gas?
>From gcc-bugs-return-454759-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jun 24 08:12:59 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-454759-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30823 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2014 08:12:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30701 invoked by uid 48); 24 Jun 2014 08:12:50 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/61572] [4.10 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1335
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ra
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status component assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-61572-4-swfa4MKL7z@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61572-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61572-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg01841.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1602
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ida572
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|rtl-optimization |tree-optimization
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
That's because of
register __typeof__(0) c asm("rdx");
which AFAIK makes 'rdx' "fixed" in the whole function.
What changed recently is that we sunk the b = c; assignment right before
its use. Not doing that fixes the issue (but I wonder if the use of
that asm isn't undefined from the start).
Note that we still happily sink stores to hard registers (that probably
always reduces hardreg lifetime).
Index: tree-ssa-sink.c
==================================================================--- tree-ssa-sink.c (revision 211928)
+++ tree-ssa-sink.c (working copy)
@@ -374,6 +374,12 @@ statement_sink_location (gimple stmt, ba
nearest to commondom. */
if (gimple_vuse (stmt))
{
+ /* Do not sink loads from hard registers. */
+ if (gimple_assign_single_p (stmt)
+ && TREE_CODE (gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt)) == VAR_DECL
+ && DECL_HARD_REGISTER (gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt)))
+ return false;
+
imm_use_iterator imm_iter;
use_operand_p use_p;
basic_block found = NULL;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31782] Invalid assembly code on initial dollar signs
[not found] <bug-31782-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-24 7:37 ` raphael.jakse at gmail dot com
@ 2021-07-29 23:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-29 23:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-29 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2021-07-29
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31782] Invalid assembly code on initial dollar signs
[not found] <bug-31782-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2021-07-29 23:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-29 23:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-29 23:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-29 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rwxr-xr-x at gmx dot de
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 52554 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31782] Invalid assembly code on initial dollar signs
[not found] <bug-31782-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2021-07-29 23:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-29 23:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-03 1:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-02 21:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-29 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kerrg at ccs dot neu.edu
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 46163 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31782] Invalid assembly code on initial dollar signs
[not found] <bug-31782-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2021-07-29 23:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-08-03 1:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-02 21:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-03 1:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |greened at obbligato dot org
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 45591 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31782] Invalid assembly code on initial dollar signs
[not found] <bug-31782-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2021-08-03 1:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-04-02 21:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-04-02 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Dup of bug 91298 .
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 91298 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread