public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow
[not found] <bug-31897-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-06-27 11:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-27 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #19 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-27 11:12:09 UTC ---
The GCC 4.3 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow
2007-05-10 15:53 [Bug target/31897] New: [Regression 4.3] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-04 12:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-22 18:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-22 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:11 -------
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow
2007-05-10 15:53 [Bug target/31897] New: [Regression 4.3] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-24 10:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-04 12:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:28 -------
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow
2007-05-10 15:53 [Bug target/31897] New: [Regression 4.3] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2008-08-27 22:13 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-24 10:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-24 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 10:19 -------
GCC 4.3.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.3 |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow
2007-05-10 15:53 [Bug target/31897] New: [Regression 4.3] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2008-08-23 20:08 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2008-08-27 22:13 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-24 10:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-08-27 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-27 22:01 -------
4.3.2 is released, changing milestones to 4.3.3.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.2 |4.3.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow
2007-05-10 15:53 [Bug target/31897] New: [Regression 4.3] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2008-01-30 16:59 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-08-23 20:08 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-08-27 22:13 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2008-08-23 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-08-23 20:07 -------
Looking at http://users.physik.fu-berlin.de/~tburnus/gcc-trunk/benchmark/, it
looks that the problem was mysteriously fixed in recent mainline.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.3/4.4 Regression] 30% |[4.3 Regression] 30% speed
|speed regression with -m32 |regression with -m32 on
|on Opteron with rnflow |Opteron with rnflow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow
2007-05-10 15:53 [Bug target/31897] New: [Regression 4.3] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2008-01-19 17:21 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2008-01-30 16:59 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-23 20:08 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-01-30 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-30 16:04 -------
If you have nothing against, I would probably go for -mfpmath=sse implied by
-ftree-vectorize route then.
Since there is now i386 ABI mailing list I hope if we can move in direction of
having -mfpmath=sse by default on CPUs where it is win and when available. It
will however take few years until we can ignore non-SSE2 CPUs reasonably :(
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow
2007-05-10 15:53 [Bug target/31897] New: [Regression 4.3] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2008-01-19 12:12 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-01-19 17:21 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-01-30 16:59 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2008-01-19 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-01-19 16:31 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> Does the regression on C2 duo show even without vectorizing? It looks like
> generic SSE fpmath performance issue. There should be no reason why SSE math
> in combination with SSE vectorization should result in regression...
Hm, using latest SVN, the C2D difference is only marginal:
gfortran -O3 -m64 -march=core2 -msse3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops
-ftree-loop-linear
-fno-tree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model
-mfpmath=sse 21.37 21.38 21.41
-mfpmath=387 20.73 20.64 20.69
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU X6800 @ 2.93GHz
stepping : 5
cpu MHz : 2933.422
cache size : 4096 KB
gcc version 4.3.0 20080119 (experimental) [trunk revision 131650] (GCC)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow
2007-05-10 15:53 [Bug target/31897] New: [Regression 4.3] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2007-12-21 18:58 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2008-01-19 12:12 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-19 17:21 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-01-19 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-19 12:03 -------
Does the regression on C2 duo show even without vectorizing? It looks like
generic SSE fpmath performance issue. There should be no reason why SSE math
in combination with SSE vectorization should result in regression...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow
2007-05-10 15:53 [Bug target/31897] New: [Regression 4.3] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-19 17:53 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2007-12-21 18:58 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-01-19 12:12 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2007-12-21 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-12-21 18:57 -------
Confirmed on K8 at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-12/msg01042.html
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|missed-optimization |
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-12-21 18:57:56
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow
2007-05-10 15:53 [Bug target/31897] New: [Regression 4.3] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-09 14:55 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-19 17:53 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2007-12-21 18:58 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2007-10-19 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-10-19 17:53 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> It is little bit sick, but what about implying -mfpmath=sse when
> -ftree-vectorize is used and SSE is available?
Then you will hit Core2 Duo, that shows the opposite in 32bit and 64bit mode:
-O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops -msse3 -m32 -mfpmath=387
user 0m22.785s
-O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops -msse3 -m32 -mfpmath=sse
user 0.27.886s
-O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops -msse3 -m64 -mfpmath=387
user 0m20.473s
-O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops -msse3 -m64 -mfpmath=sse
user 0.25.046s
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow
2007-05-10 15:53 [Bug target/31897] New: [Regression 4.3] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2007-08-10 0:27 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-09 14:55 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-19 17:53 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-09 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 14:54 -------
It is little bit sick, but what about implying -mfpmath=sse when
-ftree-vectorize is used and SSE is available?
The reason why we don't default to fpmath=sse is because the extra precision is
told to be part of i386 ABI, with vectorization we are not going to maintain
this "feature" anyway.
I can easily imagine that many users will try -ftree-vectorize and forget about
-mfpmath...
Honza
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow
2007-05-10 15:53 [Bug target/31897] New: [Regression 4.3] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2007-07-18 12:05 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2007-08-10 0:27 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 14:55 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-08-10 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow
2007-05-10 15:53 [Bug target/31897] New: [Regression 4.3] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2007-07-04 12:32 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2007-07-18 12:05 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2007-08-10 0:27 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2007-07-18 12:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-07-18 12:05 -------
The problem is in cptrf2 function when both -mfpmath=387 and -ftree-vectorize
are used.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow
2007-05-10 15:53 [Bug target/31897] New: [Regression 4.3] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-07-04 12:29 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2007-07-04 12:32 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2007-07-18 12:05 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (12 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2007-07-04 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-07-04 12:32 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> gfortran -ffast-math -funroll-loops -O3 -msse3 -mfpmath=387 rnflow.f90
>
> time ./a.out
> user 0m37.982s
> gfortran -ffast-math -funroll-loops -O3 -msse3 -mfpmath=387 -ftree-vectorize
> rnflow.f90
>
> time ./a.out
> user 0m55.031s
This is on XEON as in Comment #3.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow
2007-05-10 15:53 [Bug target/31897] New: [Regression 4.3] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-30 9:15 ` [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-04 11:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-07-04 12:29 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2007-07-04 12:32 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (13 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2007-07-04 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-07-04 12:29 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Can't reproduce this, gcc 4.3 actually seems to be faster (tests done on Intel
> quadcore Core2):
On core2 the bug doesn't trigger, but it shows on FC4 with:
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 4
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz
stepping : 10
cpu MHz : 3600.970
cache size : 2048 KB
This is one of most mysterious bugs I've ever seen. The _idamax routine is
exactly the same for both builds, but it shows such a difference. I have
analyzed this with cachegrind but nothing sticks out there.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow
2007-05-10 15:53 [Bug target/31897] New: [Regression 4.3] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-30 9:15 ` [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-07-04 11:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-04 12:29 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (14 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-07-04 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-04 11:57 -------
Can't reproduce this, gcc 4.3 actually seems to be faster (tests done on Intel
quadcore Core2):
/usr/src/gcc-4.2/obj/gcc/gfortran -B /usr/src/gcc-4.2/obj/gcc/ -L
/usr/src/gcc-4.2/obj/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/32/libgfortran/.libs/
-Wl,-rpath,/usr/src/gcc-4.2/obj/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/32/libgfortran/.libs/
-m32 -march=opteron -ffast-math -funroll-loops -ftree-vectorize
-ftree-loop-linear -O3 rnflow.f90 -o rnflow42
/usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/gfortran -B /usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/ -L
/usr/src/gcc/obj/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/32/libgfortran/.libs/
-Wl,-rpath,/usr/src/gcc/obj/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/32/libgfortran/.libs/ -m32
-march=opteron -ffast-math -funroll-loops -ftree-vectorize -ftree-loop-linear
-O3 rnflow.f90 -o rnflow43
gfortran -m32 -march=opteron -ffast-math -funroll-loops -ftree-vectorize
-ftree-loop-linear -O3 rnflow.f90 -o rnflow41
for i in 1 2 3; do time ./rnflow4$i > /dev/null; time ./rnflow4$i > /dev/null;
done
real 0m30.003s
user 0m29.601s
sys 0m0.399s
real 0m29.811s
user 0m29.436s
sys 0m0.370s
real 0m29.875s
user 0m29.468s
sys 0m0.403s
real 0m29.824s
user 0m29.441s
sys 0m0.378s
real 0m26.007s
user 0m25.627s
sys 0m0.376s
real 0m25.822s
user 0m25.403s
sys 0m0.415s
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow
2007-05-10 15:53 [Bug target/31897] New: [Regression 4.3] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-06-30 9:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-04 11:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-30 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Summary|[Regression 4.3] 30% speed |[4.3 Regression] 30% speed
|regression with -m32 on |regression with -m32 on
|Opteron with rnflow |Opteron with rnflow
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-27 11:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-31897-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-06-27 11:15 ` [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] 30% speed regression with -m32 on Opteron with rnflow rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2007-05-10 15:53 [Bug target/31897] New: [Regression 4.3] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-30 9:15 ` [Bug target/31897] [4.3 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-04 11:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-04 12:29 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2007-07-04 12:32 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2007-07-18 12:05 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2007-08-10 0:27 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 14:55 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-19 17:53 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2007-12-21 18:58 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-01-19 12:12 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-19 17:21 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-01-30 16:59 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-23 20:08 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-08-27 22:13 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-24 10:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).