public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/31914]  New: FRE does not do const or copy propagation while it could
@ 2007-05-13 21:32 rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-11-04 15:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/31914] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-05-13 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

FRE has all the information available, it's simply not used because eliminate()
does not consider copy statements (and does not run elimination on PHI
arguments
for the same reason).  Also for full const/copy propagation COND_EXPRs need to
be value-numbered.

This would let us get rid of a copyprop and a ccp pass.

I have a prototype patch (still lacks COND_EXPR VN).


-- 
           Summary: FRE does not do const or copy propagation while it could
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
 BugsThisDependsOn: 30997


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31914


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/31914] FRE does not do const or copy propagation while it could
  2007-05-13 21:32 [Bug tree-optimization/31914] New: FRE does not do const or copy propagation while it could rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-11-04 15:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-01-07 13:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-04-04 17:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-11-04 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-11-04 15:51 -------
Confirmed.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2007-11-04 15:51:43
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31914


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/31914] FRE does not do const or copy propagation while it could
  2007-05-13 21:32 [Bug tree-optimization/31914] New: FRE does not do const or copy propagation while it could rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-11-04 15:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/31914] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-01-07 13:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-04-04 17:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-01-07 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-01-07 12:11 -------
Created an attachment (id=14893)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14893&action=view)
patch for copyprop in the simple case

Produced while working on PR34683 (though doesn't help that significantly).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31914


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/31914] FRE does not do const or copy propagation while it could
  2007-05-13 21:32 [Bug tree-optimization/31914] New: FRE does not do const or copy propagation while it could rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-11-04 15:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/31914] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-01-07 13:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-04 17:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-04 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-04-04 17:58 -------
I think we don't want this one being fixed.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31914


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-04 17:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-13 21:32 [Bug tree-optimization/31914] New: FRE does not do const or copy propagation while it could rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-04 15:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/31914] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-07 13:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-04 17:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).