From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-219171-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15508 invoked by alias); 23 May 2007 13:52:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 15461 invoked by uid 48); 23 May 2007 13:52:20 -0000
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:52:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug testsuite/32057]  New: Random failure on gfortran.dg/secnds.f
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-32057-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "hjl at lucon dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg02036.txt.bz2

I got random failure on gfortran.dg/secnds.f, which has

      t1 = secnds (0.0)
      call date_and_time (dum1, dum2, dum3, values)
      t1a = secnds (0.0)
      dat1 = 0.001*real (values(8)) + real (values(7)) +
     &        60.0*real (values(6)) + 3600.0* real (values(5))
      if (((dat1 - t1) < 0.) .or. ((dat1 - t1) > (t1a - t1))) call abort ()
      do j=1,10000
        do i=1,10000
        end do
      end do
      t2a = secnds (t1a)
      call date_and_time (dum1, dum2, dum3, values)
      t2 = secnds (t1)
      dat2 = 0.001*real (values(8)) + real (values(7)) +
     &        60.0*real (values(6)) + 3600.0* real (values(5))
      if (((dat2 - dat1) < t2a) .or. ((dat2 - dat1) > t2)) call abort ()

I assume the dummy loop is used for delay. I don't think it is that reliable.
Can't we use sleep here?


-- 
           Summary: Random failure on gfortran.dg/secnds.f
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: testsuite
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32057