From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-219639-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22417 invoked by alias); 28 May 2007 16:59:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 22394 invoked by uid 48); 28 May 2007 16:59:33 -0000
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug c++/32126]  New: [4.3 regression] ICE with invalid definition of variadic template
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-32126-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg02504.txt.bz2

The following invalid code snippet triggers an ICE on mainline:

========================================================
template<typename...> struct A;

template<typename...T> struct A<T>
{
  static int i;
};

A<char> a;
A<int> b;
========================================================

bug.cc:3: error: parameter packs not expanded with `...':
bug.cc:3: note:         'T'
bug.cc:4: error: parameter packs not expanded with `...':
bug.cc:4: note:         'T'
bug.cc: In instantiation of 'A<int>':
bug.cc:9:   instantiated from here
bug.cc:5: internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at
cp/semantics.c:2270
Please submit a full bug report, [etc.]


-- 
           Summary: [4.3 regression] ICE with invalid definition of variadic
                    template
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, error-recovery, monitored
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32126