public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "post+gcc at ralfj dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/32667] block copy with exact overlap is expanded as memcpy Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 07:20:18 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-32667-4-DkKwoyP0OM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-32667-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667 --- Comment #52 from post+gcc at ralfj dot de --- For the point discussed earlier with the `restrict` in the musl memcpy, I had another look at the definition of `restrict` and it's not entirely clear to me any more that there is UB here. The restrict rules only apply to objects that are "also modified (by any means)". Now the question is, does "*X = *X" modify the object? Is a write always a modification or only if the stores representation changes or only if the stored value changes? If it requires a representation change, then "memcpy(x, x, n)" does not modify anything, and hence there is no UB from "restrict".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-28 7:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-32667-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2011-12-05 17:00 ` [Bug middle-end/32667] builtin operator= generates memcpy with overlapping memory regions lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2011-12-05 20:38 ` mans at mansr dot com 2011-12-06 8:46 ` [Bug middle-end/32667] block copy with exact overlap is expanded as memcpy rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-12 5:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-12 9:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-12 9:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-09-28 18:18 ` hugh at mimosa dot com 2021-06-09 18:50 ` public at timruffing dot de 2021-06-10 6:36 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2023-01-05 8:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-05 9:19 ` nyh at math dot technion.ac.il 2023-01-06 18:48 ` lopresti at gmail dot com 2023-10-28 10:04 ` post+gcc at ralfj dot de 2023-11-21 15:57 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2023-11-22 7:33 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2023-11-22 14:57 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2023-11-22 15:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-22 19:07 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2023-11-23 0:00 ` lopresti at gmail dot com 2023-11-23 7:44 ` post+gcc at ralfj dot de 2023-11-23 7:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-23 8:03 ` fw at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-23 8:08 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2023-11-23 8:32 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-23 8:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-23 13:54 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2023-11-23 13:57 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2023-11-23 14:41 ` public at timruffing dot de 2023-11-23 15:00 ` public at timruffing dot de 2023-11-23 15:01 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-23 15:29 ` post+gcc at ralfj dot de 2023-11-23 18:55 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2023-11-23 19:04 ` post+gcc at ralfj dot de 2023-11-23 20:27 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2023-11-24 8:19 ` public at timruffing dot de 2023-11-24 9:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-24 10:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-24 19:08 ` post+gcc at ralfj dot de 2023-11-27 14:12 ` post+gcc at ralfj dot de 2023-11-27 23:32 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com 2023-11-28 7:17 ` post+gcc at ralfj dot de 2023-11-28 7:20 ` post+gcc at ralfj dot de [this message] 2023-11-28 10:58 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2023-11-28 11:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-28 11:07 ` fw at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-04 12:52 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-04 13:22 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2024-01-04 13:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-04 14:28 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-04 14:29 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2024-01-04 14:41 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-04 14:44 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-32667-4-DkKwoyP0OM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).