From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-226166-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9583 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2007 16:23:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 9561 invoked by uid 48); 2 Aug 2007 16:22:53 -0000
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug fortran/32969]  New: (rr)?spacing give wrong answers with -fdefault-integer-8
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-32969-12313@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00097.txt.bz2

With -fdefault-integer-8 the following code:

program test_rrspacing
  real x
  x = 3.0
  x = rrspacing(x)
  print *, x, spacing(x), spacing(3.0)
  x = 3.0
  x = spacing(x)
  print *, x
end

gives:

  0.7500000      1.6777216E+07  2.3841858E-07
  1.6777216E+07

instead of

  1.2582912E+07   1.000000      2.3841858E-07
  2.3841858E-07

Note that like PR32933 the code does not involve directly integers and as in
the original test of PR32770 it seems to be linked to bigendian platforms (PPC
here).


-- 
           Summary: (rr)?spacing give wrong answers with -fdefault-integer-8
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32969