public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
@ 2007-08-17 20:59 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
2007-09-04 18:10 ` [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3 regression] " ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (38 more replies)
0 siblings, 39 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: brett dot albertson at stratech dot com @ 2007-08-17 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
I now get this during bootstrap on Solaris x86 using the native linker
(/usr/ccs/bin/ld):
ld: fatal: unwind table: file
/u01/var/tmp/gcc_trunk_svn/gcc_20070817/./gcc/amd64/crtend.o: section
.eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
gmake[5]: *** [libgcc_s.so] Error 1
gmake[5]: Leaving directory
`/u01/var/tmp/gcc_trunk_svn/gcc_20070817/i386-pc-solaris2.11/amd64/libgcc'
Let me know if you need more information. It seems to occur when linking the
64bit libgcc.
Brett Albertson
--
Summary: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version
0: offset 0x0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11
GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11
GCC target triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
@ 2007-09-04 18:10 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-06 3:21 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (37 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-04 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 18:10 -------
Confirmed on i386-pc-solaris2.10. This is a mainline regression. A reghunt
revealed that this patch
2007-08-06 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
PR target/31868
* config.gcc (x86_64-*-freebsd*): Add i386/t-crtstuff to
tmake_file.
(x86_64-*-netbsd*): Likewise.
(x86_64-*-linux*): Likewise.
(x86_64-*-kfreebsd*-gnu): Likewise.
(x86_64-*-knetbsd*-gnu): Likewise.
(i[34567]86-*-solaris2.1[0-9]*): Likewise.
is the culprit: running elfdump on the amd64 crtend.o before and after the
patch, I find (before):
Unwind Section: .eh_frame
CIE: [0x00000000]
length: 0x00 cieid: 0
version: 0 augstring: `'
codealign: 0x0 dataalign: 0 retaddr: 0
vs. (after):
Unwind Section: .eh_frame
FDE: [0x00000000]
length: 0x00 cieptr: 0x18
initloc: 0x00000000 addrrange: 0x0000
Auxiliary vals:
CIE: [0x00000004]
length: 0x18 cieid: 0
version: 1 augstring: `zR'
codealign: 0x1 dataalign: -8 retaddr: 16
So the linker seems to be right to complain about this.
Rainer
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-09-04 18:10:17
date| |
Summary|on bootstrap getting section|[4.3 regression] on
|.eh_frame: bad cie version |bootstrap getting section
|0: offset 0x0 |.eh_frame: bad cie version
| |0: offset 0x0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
2007-09-04 18:10 ` [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3 regression] " ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-09-06 3:21 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-09-06 13:03 ` brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (36 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2007-09-06 3:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-06 03:21 -------
As indicated in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00512.html
there is at least one person has bootstrapped gcc successfully on
i386-pc-solaris2.10.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
2007-09-04 18:10 ` [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3 regression] " ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-06 3:21 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2007-09-06 13:03 ` brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
2007-09-06 13:25 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
` (35 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: brett dot albertson at stratech dot com @ 2007-09-06 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from brett dot albertson at stratech dot com 2007-09-06 13:03 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
Something changed and it is now working for me, but this did exist on mainline
for at least some period of time. Rainer, are you still seeing this behavior?
Brett
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-06 13:03 ` brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
@ 2007-09-06 13:25 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2007-09-06 17:47 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (34 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de @ 2007-09-06 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2007-09-06 13:25 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie
version 0: offset 0x0
brett dot albertson at stratech dot com writes:
> Something changed and it is now working for me, but this did exist on mainline
> for at least some period of time. Rainer, are you still seeing this behavior?
I haven't tried a newer tree (> 20070903) yet. A difference might be that
Art uses GNU ld (he doesn't state so, though) while Brett and I use Sun ld.
Rainer
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-06 13:25 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
@ 2007-09-06 17:47 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-09-10 14:41 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
` (33 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2007-09-06 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-06 17:47 -------
It could be caused by bugs in assembler/linker on Solaris.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-06 17:47 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2007-09-10 14:41 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2007-09-11 11:49 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (32 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de @ 2007-09-10 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2007-09-10 14:41 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie
version 0: offset 0x0
hjl at lucon dot org writes:
> It could be caused by bugs in assembler/linker on Solaris.
The assembler in question is gas 2.15, and the linker check seems to be
completely deliberate. The error is issued by libld, whose source can be
browsed at opensolaris.org:
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/cmd/sgs/libld/common/unwind.amd.c
around line 396. The old crtend.o had CIE version 1 as expected, the new
one has version 0.
Rainer
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-10 14:41 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
@ 2007-09-11 11:49 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-11 12:24 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (31 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-11 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-11 11:49 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-09-11 12:24 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-09-11 12:46 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (30 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2007-09-11 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-11 12:24 -------
Binutils 2.15 is very old. Can you try binutils 2.18?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-11 12:24 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2007-09-11 12:46 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-11 12:47 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (29 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-11 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-11 12:46 -------
Created an attachment (id=14188)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14188&action=view)
crtend.s without -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-11 12:46 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-09-11 12:47 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-11 12:48 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
` (28 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-11 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-11 12:47 -------
Created an attachment (id=14189)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14189&action=view)
crtend.s with -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-11 12:47 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-09-11 12:48 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2007-09-11 13:44 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (27 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de @ 2007-09-11 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2007-09-11 12:48 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie
version 0: offset 0x0
hjl at lucon dot org writes:
> Binutils 2.15 is very old. Can you try binutils 2.18?
It doesn't make a difference: although the object files are not completely
identical, the problematic .eh_frame section stays the same.
I've uploaded the output with -save-temps before and after adding
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables. The after version contains the empty
.eh_frame section with cie version 0 which causes ld to complain.
Rainer
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-11 12:48 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
@ 2007-09-11 13:44 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-10-10 17:49 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (26 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2007-09-11 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-11 13:43 -------
.eh_frame section in the new crtend.S only has 4 byte:
[ 7] .eh_frame X86_64_UNWIND 0000000000000000 000000b8
0000000000000004 0000000000000000 A 0 0 4
which is the zero terminator:
bash-3.2$ readelf -wf crtend.o
The section .eh_frame contains:
00000000 ZERO terminator
bash-3.2$
Sun linker doesn't properly handle ZERO terminator in .eh_frame. It looks
like a Sun linker bug to me.
BTW, did your elfdump report
vs. (after):
Unwind Section: .eh_frame
FDE: [0x00000000]
length: 0x00 cieptr: 0x18
initloc: 0x00000000 addrrange: 0x0000
Auxiliary vals:
CIE: [0x00000004]
length: 0x18 cieid: 0
version: 1 augstring: `zR'
codealign: 0x1 dataalign: -8 retaddr: 16
It doesn't look like .eh_frame in the new crtend.o at all. That may be
a bug in your elfdump.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-11 13:44 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2007-10-10 17:49 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-14 21:28 ` [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 " jcea at hispasec dot com
` (25 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-10 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-10 17:49 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-03-14 21:28 ` jcea at hispasec dot com
2008-03-15 0:43 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (24 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: jcea at hispasec dot com @ 2008-03-14 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from jcea at hispasec dot com 2008-03-14 21:27 -------
Bug hit trying to compile GCC 4.3.0 using SUN ld. If I use the gnu ld (2.18),
compiler builds fine, but then I have problems with tools like gdb and such,
specially with shared libraries. So, no luck.
Post a link to this bug to OpenSolaris linking mailing list.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-14 21:28 ` [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 " jcea at hispasec dot com
@ 2008-03-15 0:43 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-22 3:15 ` Daniel dot Davies at xerox dot com
` (23 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-03-15 0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-15 00:41 -------
Update milestone after 4.3.0 release.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.0 |4.3.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-15 0:43 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-05-22 3:15 ` Daniel dot Davies at xerox dot com
2008-05-29 2:30 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
` (22 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: Daniel dot Davies at xerox dot com @ 2008-05-22 3:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from Daniel dot Davies at xerox dot com 2008-05-22 03:14 -------
Bug also hit when installing 4.2.4.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2008-05-22 3:15 ` Daniel dot Davies at xerox dot com
@ 2008-05-29 2:30 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
2008-06-06 14:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (21 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: cnstar9988 at gmail dot com @ 2008-05-29 2:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-29 02:30 -------
i386-pc-solaris2.10 has the same problem.
--
cnstar9988 at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2008-05-29 2:30 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
@ 2008-06-06 14:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-06-09 16:24 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
` (20 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-06-06 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-06 14:57 -------
4.3.1 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.1 |4.3.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2008-06-06 14:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-06-09 16:24 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2008-06-11 14:42 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (19 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com @ 2008-06-09 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2008-06-09 16:23 -------
This bug is fixed in opensolaris:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6685125
Fixed in revision 6388:
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/search?q=&defs=&refs=&path=&hist=6388&project=%2Fonnv
We have filed case #65952072 with Sun to get this backported to Solaris 10.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2008-06-09 16:24 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
@ 2008-06-11 14:42 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-07-18 3:38 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
` (18 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2008-06-11 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #18 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-06-11 14:41 -------
*** Bug 36496 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kate01123 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2008-06-11 14:42 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2008-07-18 3:38 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
2008-08-27 22:13 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: cnstar9988 at gmail dot com @ 2008-07-18 3:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #19 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-07-18 03:37 -------
ping...
gcc 4.2.3 works well, gcc 4.2.4/4.3.0/4.3.1 works failed.
i386-pc-solaris2.10
gas 2.18 + sun ld
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-18 3:38 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
@ 2008-08-27 22:13 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-10-08 17:21 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
` (16 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-08-27 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #20 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-27 22:02 -------
4.3.2 is released, changing milestones to 4.3.3.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.2 |4.3.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2008-08-27 22:13 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-10-08 17:21 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2008-10-08 17:24 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de @ 2008-10-08 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #21 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2008-10-08 17:20 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad
cie version 0: offset 0x0
FTR: I've long been using this patch as a workaround until the neccessary
Sun ld patch is available:
Index: gcc/config.gcc
===================================================================
--- gcc/config.gcc (revision 140759)
+++ gcc/config.gcc (working copy)
@@ -1205,7 +1205,10 @@ i[34567]86-*-solaris2*)
*-*-solaris2.1[0-9]*)
tm_file="${tm_file} i386/x86-64.h i386/sol2-10.h"
tm_defines="${tm_defines} TARGET_BI_ARCH=1"
- tmake_file="$tmake_file i386/t-crtstuff i386/t-sol2-10"
+ tmake_file="$tmake_file i386/t-sol2-10"
+ if test x$gnu_ld = xyes; then
+ tmake_file="$tmake_file i386/t-crtstuff"
+ fi
need_64bit_hwint=yes
case X"${with_cpu}" in
Xgeneric|Xcore2|Xnocona|Xx86-64|Xamdfam10|Xbarcelona|Xk8|Xopteron|Xathlon64|Xathlon-fx)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2008-10-08 17:21 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
@ 2008-10-08 17:24 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-10-09 7:17 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
` (14 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-10-08 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #22 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-08 17:22 -------
> FTR: I've long been using this patch as a workaround until the neccessary
> Sun ld patch is available:
Ah, this is helpful, thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2008-10-08 17:24 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-10-09 7:17 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
2008-10-09 11:02 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
` (13 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: cnstar9988 at gmail dot com @ 2008-10-09 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #23 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-10-09 07:16 -------
to Rainer Orth.
when apply your patch on gcc 4.3.2 release, cause PR37777.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2008-10-09 7:17 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
@ 2008-10-09 11:02 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
2008-10-09 11:24 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: cnstar9988 at gmail dot com @ 2008-10-09 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #24 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-10-09 11:00 -------
works ok on gcc 4.3.2
--- config.gcc.4.3.2.old Thu Oct 9 18:51:26 2008
+++ config.gcc.4.3.2.new Thu Oct 9 18:51:26 2008
@@ -1289,7 +1289,7 @@
*-*-solaris2.1[0-9]*)
tm_file="${tm_file} i386/x86-64.h i386/sol2-10.h"
tm_defines="${tm_defines} TARGET_BI_ARCH=1"
- tmake_file="$tmake_file i386/t-crtstuff i386/t-sol2-10"
+ tmake_file="$tmake_file i386/t-sol2-10"
need_64bit_hwint=yes
# FIXME: -m64 for i[34567]86-*-* should be allowed just
# like -m32 for x86_64-*-*.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
2008-10-09 11:02 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
@ 2008-10-09 11:24 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-10-09 17:36 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-10-09 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #25 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-09 11:22 -------
> to Rainer Orth.
> when apply your patch on gcc 4.3.2 release, cause PR37777.
Are you really sure? Please retry and close the PR otherwise.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
2008-10-09 11:24 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-10-09 17:36 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-10-10 0:43 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
` (10 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-10-09 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #26 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-09 17:35 -------
> We have filed case #65952072 with Sun to get this backported to Solaris 10.
Do you have any news about this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
2008-10-09 17:36 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-10-10 0:43 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
2008-10-10 5:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: cnstar9988 at gmail dot com @ 2008-10-10 0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #27 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-10-10 00:42 -------
works well on gcc 4.3.2 + patch.
I don't build libgcc_s.so.
gas 2.18 + gmp 4.2.4 + mpfr 2.3.2.
Configured with: ../src/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.3.2
--with-gmp=/opt/gcc-4.3.2 --with-mpfr=/opt/gcc-4.3.2
--with-as=/usr/local/bin/as --with-gnu-as --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld
--without-gnu-ld --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-shared --disable-nls
--with-cpu=generic --build=i386-pc-solaris2.10
--- config.gcc.4.3.2.old Thu Oct 9 18:51:26 2008
+++ config.gcc.4.3.2.new Thu Oct 9 18:51:26 2008
@@ -1289,7 +1289,7 @@
*-*-solaris2.1[0-9]*)
tm_file="${tm_file} i386/x86-64.h i386/sol2-10.h"
tm_defines="${tm_defines} TARGET_BI_ARCH=1"
- tmake_file="$tmake_file i386/t-crtstuff i386/t-sol2-10"
+ tmake_file="$tmake_file i386/t-sol2-10"
need_64bit_hwint=yes
# FIXME: -m64 for i[34567]86-*-* should be allowed just
# like -m32 for x86_64-*-*.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
2008-10-10 0:43 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
@ 2008-10-10 5:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-10-10 14:42 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
` (8 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-10-10 5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #28 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-10 05:14 -------
> works well on gcc 4.3.2 + patch.
Thanks but this patch is not suitable for the branch, only Rainer's is. And
you didn't say whether you can reproduce PR 37777 so I'm closing it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
2008-10-10 5:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-10-10 14:42 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2008-11-06 15:44 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de @ 2008-10-10 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #29 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2008-10-10 14:41 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad
cie version 0: offset 0x0
I've just formally submitted my patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-10/msg00441.html
with some suggestions how a complete fix would look like if necessary.
Rainer
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (30 preceding siblings ...)
2008-10-10 14:42 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
@ 2008-11-06 15:44 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-06 15:46 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-06 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #30 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-06 15:43 -------
Subject: Bug 33100
Author: ro
Date: Thu Nov 6 15:41:52 2008
New Revision: 141647
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141647
Log:
PR bootstrap/33100
* config.gcc (i[34567]86-*-solaris2*): Include i386/t-crtstuff
only with GNU ld.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/config.gcc
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (32 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-06 15:46 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-06 15:46 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2008-11-20 17:12 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de @ 2008-11-06 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #31 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2008-11-06 15:45 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad
cie version 0: offset 0x0
Fixed for 4.2.5.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (31 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-06 15:44 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-06 15:46 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-06 15:46 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
` (5 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-06 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2007-09-04 18:10:17 |2008-11-06 15:44:47
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (33 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-06 15:46 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
@ 2008-11-20 17:12 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-20 17:15 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-20 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #32 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-20 17:11 -------
Subject: Bug 33100
Author: ro
Date: Thu Nov 20 17:09:53 2008
New Revision: 142049
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142049
Log:
gcc:
PR bootstrap/33100
* config.gcc (i[34567]86-*-solaris2*): Don't include
i386/t-crtstuff here.
Move extra_parts, i386/t-sol2 in tmake_file to libgcc/config.host.
* config/i386/t-sol2: Move to libgcc/config/i386.
libgcc:
PR bootstrap/33100
* configure.ac (i?86-*-solaris2.1[0-9]*): Only include
i386/t-crtstuff if linker supports ZERO terminator unwind entries.
* configure: Regenerate.
* config.host (i[34567]86-*-solaris2*): Move i386/t-sol2 in
tmake_file here from gcc/config.gcc.
Move extra_parts here from gcc/config.gcc.
* config/i386/t-sol2: Move here from gcc/config/i386.
Use gcc_srcdir instead of srcdir.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/libgcc/config/i386/t-sol2
- copied, changed from r142012,
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/config/i386/t-sol2
Removed:
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/config/i386/t-sol2
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/config.gcc
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/libgcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/libgcc/config.host
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/libgcc/configure
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/libgcc/configure.ac
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (34 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-20 17:12 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-20 17:15 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-20 17:16 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
` (2 subsequent siblings)
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-20 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #33 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-20 17:14 -------
Subject: Bug 33100
Author: ro
Date: Thu Nov 20 17:13:01 2008
New Revision: 142050
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142050
Log:
gcc:
PR bootstrap/33100
* config.gcc (i[34567]86-*-solaris2*): Don't include
i386/t-crtstuff here.
Move extra_parts, i386/t-sol2 in tmake_file to libgcc/config.host.
* config/i386/t-sol2: Move to libgcc/config/i386.
libgcc:
PR bootstrap/33100
* configure.ac (i?86-*-solaris2.1[0-9]*): Only include
i386/t-crtstuff if linker supports ZERO terminator unwind entries.
* configure: Regenerate.
* config.host (i[34567]86-*-solaris2*): Move i386/t-sol2 in
tmake_file here from gcc/config.gcc.
Move extra_parts here from gcc/config.gcc.
* config/i386/t-sol2: Move here from gcc/config/i386.
Use gcc_srcdir instead of srcdir.
Added:
trunk/libgcc/config/i386/t-sol2
- copied, changed from r142008, trunk/gcc/config/i386/t-sol2
Removed:
trunk/gcc/config/i386/t-sol2
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config.gcc
trunk/libgcc/ChangeLog
trunk/libgcc/config.host
trunk/libgcc/configure
trunk/libgcc/configure.ac
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (35 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-20 17:15 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-20 17:16 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2008-11-20 17:35 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-11 19:03 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de @ 2008-11-20 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #34 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2008-11-20 17:14 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad
cie version 0: offset 0x0
Fixed for 4.3.3, 4.4.0:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg00990.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (36 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-20 17:16 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
@ 2008-11-20 17:35 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-11 19:03 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-20 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #35 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-20 17:33 -------
Fixed for all active release branches.
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
` (37 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-20 17:35 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-11 19:03 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
38 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com @ 2009-02-11 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #36 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2009-02-11 19:03 -------
(In reply to comment #26)
> > We have filed case #65952072 with Sun to get this backported to Solaris 10.
>
> Do you have any news about this?
Sun just released patch 139574-03 for SPARC and 139575-03 for x86. We've built
gcc-4.2.4 with the x86 patch and it resolved the issue for us.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 40+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-11 19:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-08-17 20:59 [Bug bootstrap/33100] New: on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0 brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
2007-09-04 18:10 ` [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3 regression] " ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-06 3:21 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-09-06 13:03 ` brett dot albertson at stratech dot com
2007-09-06 13:25 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2007-09-06 17:47 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-09-10 14:41 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2007-09-11 11:49 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-11 12:24 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-09-11 12:46 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-11 12:47 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-11 12:48 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2007-09-11 13:44 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-10-10 17:49 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-14 21:28 ` [Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 " jcea at hispasec dot com
2008-03-15 0:43 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-22 3:15 ` Daniel dot Davies at xerox dot com
2008-05-29 2:30 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
2008-06-06 14:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-06-09 16:24 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2008-06-11 14:42 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-07-18 3:38 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
2008-08-27 22:13 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-10-08 17:21 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2008-10-08 17:24 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-10-09 7:17 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
2008-10-09 11:02 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
2008-10-09 11:24 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-10-09 17:36 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-10-10 0:43 ` cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
2008-10-10 5:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-10-10 14:42 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2008-11-06 15:44 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-06 15:46 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-06 15:46 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2008-11-20 17:12 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-20 17:15 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-20 17:16 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2008-11-20 17:35 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-11 19:03 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).