public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/33211]  New: [4.3 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/spu/fixed-range.c scan-assembler lqd.*21
@ 2007-08-27 21:51 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-08-27 21:51 ` [Bug middle-end/33211] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-08-27 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

gcc.target/spu/fixed-range.c fails now.  It appreaded between revision 127789
and 127837.

This test is testing -mfixed-range which should be the same as multiple
-ffixed- but it fails now.

We get now:
        lqd     $2,32($sp)

Which is wrong.


-- 
           Summary: [4.3 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/spu/fixed-range.c
                    scan-assembler lqd.*21
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: wrong-code
          Severity: critical
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: spu-elf


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33211


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/33211] [4.3 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/spu/fixed-range.c scan-assembler lqd.*21
  2007-08-27 21:51 [Bug middle-end/33211] New: [4.3 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/spu/fixed-range.c scan-assembler lqd.*21 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-08-27 21:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-08-27 22:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-08-27 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33211


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/33211] [4.3 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/spu/fixed-range.c scan-assembler lqd.*21
  2007-08-27 21:51 [Bug middle-end/33211] New: [4.3 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/spu/fixed-range.c scan-assembler lqd.*21 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-08-27 21:51 ` [Bug middle-end/33211] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-08-27 22:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-08-29 12:19 ` sandra at codesourcery dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-08-27 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-08-27 22:10 -------
I verified this was caused by revision 127832:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-08/msg00726.html

So what is most likely is happening is the inialization is happening in a
different order now which is wrong.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sandra at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33211


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/33211] [4.3 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/spu/fixed-range.c scan-assembler lqd.*21
  2007-08-27 21:51 [Bug middle-end/33211] New: [4.3 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/spu/fixed-range.c scan-assembler lqd.*21 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-08-27 21:51 ` [Bug middle-end/33211] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-08-27 22:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-08-29 12:19 ` sandra at codesourcery dot com
  2007-08-31  3:25 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-09-01  0:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: sandra at codesourcery dot com @ 2007-08-29 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from sandra at codesourcery dot com  2007-08-29 12:19 -------
See patch and discussion here:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg02027.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33211


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/33211] [4.3 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/spu/fixed-range.c scan-assembler lqd.*21
  2007-08-27 21:51 [Bug middle-end/33211] New: [4.3 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/spu/fixed-range.c scan-assembler lqd.*21 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-08-29 12:19 ` sandra at codesourcery dot com
@ 2007-08-31  3:25 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-09-01  0:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: sandra at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-08-31  3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-08-31 03:25 -------
Subject: Bug 33211

Author: sandra
Date: Fri Aug 31 03:25:02 2007
New Revision: 127951

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127951
Log:
2007-08-30  Sandra Loosemore  <sandra@codesourcery.com>

        PR middle-end/33211

        gcc/
        * regclass.c (initial_fixed_regs): Revert previous change and make
        it const again.
        (initial_call_used_regs): Likewise.
        (initial_call_really_used_regs): Delete, reverting previous addition.
        (initial_reg_names): Likewise.
        (init_reg_sets): Revert previous change.
        (saved_fixed_regs): New.
        (saved_call_used_regs): New.
        (saved_call_really_used_regs): New.
        (saved_reg_names): New.
        (save_register_info): New.
        (restore_register_info): New.
        (init_reg_sets_1): Replace reset of register info with call to
        restore_register_info.
        * rtl.h (save_register_info): Declare.
        * toplev.c (backend_init): Call save_register_info.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/regclass.c
    trunk/gcc/rtl.h
    trunk/gcc/toplev.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33211


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/33211] [4.3 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/spu/fixed-range.c scan-assembler lqd.*21
  2007-08-27 21:51 [Bug middle-end/33211] New: [4.3 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/spu/fixed-range.c scan-assembler lqd.*21 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-08-31  3:25 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-09-01  0:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-01  0:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-09-01 00:35 -------
Fixed.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33211


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-01  0:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-08-27 21:51 [Bug middle-end/33211] New: [4.3 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/spu/fixed-range.c scan-assembler lqd.*21 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-27 21:51 ` [Bug middle-end/33211] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-27 22:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-29 12:19 ` sandra at codesourcery dot com
2007-08-31  3:25 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-01  0:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).