public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/33513]  New: error reported on correct initialization code.
@ 2007-09-21  2:57 clerman at fuse dot net
  2007-09-21  3:46 ` [Bug fortran/33513] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: clerman at fuse dot net @ 2007-09-21  2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

I get the following error message:

mtftypesM.f90:615.71:

  real (DOUB_PREC), parameter :: DEFAULT_MTF_FIELDS(2, MTF_FIELD_PTS) = &
                                                                      1
Error: Extension: Evaluation of nonstandard initialization expression at (1)
mtftypesM.f90:441.52:

on the following line of code:

  real (DOUB_PREC), parameter :: DEFAULT_MTF_FIELDS(2, MTF_FIELD_PTS) = &
    & reshape ((/0.0_DOUB_PREC, 0.0_DOUB_PREC, 0.0_DOUB_PREC, 0.35_DOUB_PREC,
0.0_DOUB_PREC, 0.7_DOUB_PREC,&
    & 0.0_DOUB_PREC, 0.85_DOUB_PREC, 0.0_DOUB_PREC, 1.0_DOUB_PREC/), shape =
(/2_TinyInteger, MTF_FIELD_PTS/))

where

  integer, parameter :: DefaultInteger = kind (1)
  integer(DefaultInteger), parameter :: TinyInteger = selected_int_kind (2)
  integer(DefaultInteger), parameter :: DOUB_PREC = selected_real_kind (15,
307)
  integer (TinyInteger), parameter ::  MTF_FIELD_PTS = 5_TinyInteger

  I believe this may be the same as bug 29962. Note that the following
compilers all correctly compile this code: Lahey LF64, NAG version 5.1, Intel
version 10, g95.

Norm Clerman


-- 
           Summary: error reported on correct initialization code.
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.2.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: major
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33513


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/33513] error reported on correct initialization code.
  2007-09-21  2:57 [Bug fortran/33513] New: error reported on correct initialization code clerman at fuse dot net
@ 2007-09-21  3:46 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-09-21  7:58 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-21  3:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-09-21 03:46 -------
What compiler options did you use?
Can you provide a self contained example?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33513


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/33513] error reported on correct initialization code.
  2007-09-21  2:57 [Bug fortran/33513] New: error reported on correct initialization code clerman at fuse dot net
  2007-09-21  3:46 ` [Bug fortran/33513] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-09-21  7:58 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-09-22 16:37 ` clerman at fuse dot net
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-21  7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-09-21 07:58 -------
I can reproduce the problem with gfortran 4.1 and 4.2 with -std=f95/-std=f2003;
however, gfortran 4.3.0 compiles this program with -std=f95 without showing
this error.

I therefore suggest you to either don't use -std=f95 or -std=f2003 for this
file or to use the 4.3.0 compiler of gfortran, available from, e.g.,
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries

As this bug is no regression, does not generate wrong code and can easily be
worked around by not using -std=f*, we will not backport the fixes to GCC 4.2.x
or even 4.1.x. (Last but not least in order to not inadvertently induce
regressions.)

It would be nice, if you could confirm that the error is indeed fixed in GCC
4.3.0.

Thanks for reporting the bug.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33513


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/33513] error reported on correct initialization code.
  2007-09-21  2:57 [Bug fortran/33513] New: error reported on correct initialization code clerman at fuse dot net
  2007-09-21  3:46 ` [Bug fortran/33513] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-09-21  7:58 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-09-22 16:37 ` clerman at fuse dot net
  2007-09-22 16:37 ` clerman at fuse dot net
  2007-09-23  9:09 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: clerman at fuse dot net @ 2007-09-22 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from clerman at fuse dot net  2007-09-22 16:37 -------
Subject: Re:  error reported on correct initialization
 code.

kargl,

    Thanks for your very prompt reply. burnus also replied to my bug 
suggesting I try version 4.3.0. I did that, and the bug is not present.

    Using this version I have located a new bug that I have reported. 
It's bug 33529.

    Thanks for your attention.

Norm Clerman

kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-09-21 03:46 -------
> What compiler options did you use?
> Can you provide a self contained example?
>
>
>   


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33513


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/33513] error reported on correct initialization code.
  2007-09-21  2:57 [Bug fortran/33513] New: error reported on correct initialization code clerman at fuse dot net
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-09-22 16:37 ` clerman at fuse dot net
@ 2007-09-22 16:37 ` clerman at fuse dot net
  2007-09-23  9:09 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: clerman at fuse dot net @ 2007-09-22 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from clerman at fuse dot net  2007-09-22 16:37 -------
Subject: Re:  error reported on correct initialization
 code.

burnus,

    Thank you for your very prompt reply. I tried version 4.3.0; the bug 
does not exist in it.

    Using this version I have located a new bug that I have reported. 
It's bug 33529.

    Thanks for your attention.

Norm Clerman


burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-09-21 07:58 -------
> I can reproduce the problem with gfortran 4.1 and 4.2 with -std=f95/-std=f2003;
> however, gfortran 4.3.0 compiles this program with -std=f95 without showing
> this error.
>
> I therefore suggest you to either don't use -std=f95 or -std=f2003 for this
> file or to use the 4.3.0 compiler of gfortran, available from, e.g.,
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries
>
> As this bug is no regression, does not generate wrong code and can easily be
> worked around by not using -std=f*, we will not backport the fixes to GCC 4.2.x
> or even 4.1.x. (Last but not least in order to not inadvertently induce
> regressions.)
>
> It would be nice, if you could confirm that the error is indeed fixed in GCC
> 4.3.0.
>
> Thanks for reporting the bug.
>
>
>   


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33513


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/33513] error reported on correct initialization code.
  2007-09-21  2:57 [Bug fortran/33513] New: error reported on correct initialization code clerman at fuse dot net
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-09-22 16:37 ` clerman at fuse dot net
@ 2007-09-23  9:09 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-23  9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-09-23 09:08 -------
Fixed on 4.3.


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33513


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-23  9:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-09-21  2:57 [Bug fortran/33513] New: error reported on correct initialization code clerman at fuse dot net
2007-09-21  3:46 ` [Bug fortran/33513] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-21  7:58 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-22 16:37 ` clerman at fuse dot net
2007-09-22 16:37 ` clerman at fuse dot net
2007-09-23  9:09 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).