public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/33840] bit-field size accepted for struct
[not found] <bug-33840-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-06-04 9:05 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-04 13:02 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-04 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33840
Volker Reichelt <reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #2 from Volker Reichelt <reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-04 09:05:30 UTC ---
This is fixed since GCC 4.6.0, but we should add a testcase before closing the
problem report.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/33840] bit-field size accepted for struct
[not found] <bug-33840-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-06-04 9:05 ` [Bug c++/33840] bit-field size accepted for struct reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-06-04 13:02 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-04 16:12 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-04 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33840
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |patch
Known to work| |4.6.0, 4.7.0
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-04 13:01:30 UTC ---
patch posted to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00305.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/33840] bit-field size accepted for struct
[not found] <bug-33840-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-06-04 9:05 ` [Bug c++/33840] bit-field size accepted for struct reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-04 13:02 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-06-04 16:12 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-04 16:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-04 16:23 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-04 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33840
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-04 16:11:47 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Jun 4 16:11:41 2011
New Revision: 174642
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174642
Log:
2011-06-04 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
PR c++/33840
* g++.dg/diagnostic/bitfld2.C: New.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/bitfld2.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/33840] bit-field size accepted for struct
[not found] <bug-33840-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-06-04 16:12 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-06-04 16:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-04 16:23 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-04 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33840
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-04 16:21:00 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Jun 4 16:20:55 2011
New Revision: 174645
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174645
Log:
2011-06-04 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
PR c++/33840
* g++.dg/diagnostic/bitfld2.C: New.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/bitfld2.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/33840] bit-field size accepted for struct
[not found] <bug-33840-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-06-04 16:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-06-04 16:23 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-04 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33840
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-04 16:22:20 UTC ---
Thanks, Volker, tests added so closing
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/33840] bit-field size accepted for struct
2007-10-20 21:57 [Bug c++/33840] New: " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-11-19 5:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-11-19 5:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:46 -------
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-11-19 05:46:02
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33840
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-04 16:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-33840-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-06-04 9:05 ` [Bug c++/33840] bit-field size accepted for struct reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-04 13:02 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-04 16:12 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-04 16:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-04 16:23 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2007-10-20 21:57 [Bug c++/33840] New: " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-19 5:46 ` [Bug c++/33840] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).