* [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects
[not found] <bug-34010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-02-01 23:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-03 9:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-01 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
Target|powerpc-apple-darwin9 |powerpc-apple-darwin9,
| |mips*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-02-01
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.7
Summary|ppc64 bad stdargs codegen |[4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7
|for zero sized objects |Regression] ppc64 bad
| |stdargs codegen for zero
| |sized objects
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-01 23:01:37 UTC ---
A patch was posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg01564.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects
[not found] <bug-34010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-02-01 23:02 ` [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-03 9:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-13 14:17 ` [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-03 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity|critical |major
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects
[not found] <bug-34010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-02-01 23:02 ` [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-03 9:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-03-13 14:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-02 12:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-13 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.4.7 |4.5.4
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-13 12:46:48 UTC ---
4.4 branch is being closed, moving to 4.5.4 target.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects
[not found] <bug-34010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-13 14:17 ` [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-07-02 12:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-12 15:17 ` [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-07-02 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.5.4 |4.6.4
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-02 12:27:51 UTC ---
The 4.5 branch is being closed, adjusting target milestone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects
[not found] <bug-34010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-07-02 12:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-04-12 15:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-12 13:45 ` [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-04-12 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.7.4
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-12 15:16:36 UTC ---
GCC 4.6.4 has been released and the branch has been closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects
[not found] <bug-34010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-04-12 15:17 ` [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-12 13:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-19 13:28 ` [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-12 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The 4.7 branch is being closed, moving target milestone to 4.8.4.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects
[not found] <bug-34010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-12 13:45 ` [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-19 13:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-12 17:38 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-19 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.8.4 |4.8.5
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.8.4 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects
[not found] <bug-34010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-19 13:28 ` [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-12 17:38 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-17 22:45 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-12 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC| |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>From Mike's comment I see this should fail on ppc -m64, however on ppc64-linux
I see:
[aldyh@gcc1-power7 gcc]$ make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=struct-layout-1.exp
...
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 140
[aldyh@gcc1-power7 gcc]$ make check-g++ RUNTESTFLAGS=struct-layout-1.exp
...
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 150
Is this still an issue, is this only visible on darwin and/or mips, or is there
another way to reproduce the problem?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects
[not found] <bug-34010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-12 17:38 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-17 22:45 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-17 23:34 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-17 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
PING
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects
[not found] <bug-34010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-17 22:45 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-17 23:34 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-18 0:06 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: mrs at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-17 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org <mrs at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org <mrs at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I haven't had a ppc64 box for years. Either, the tests results mailing list or
you'd have to ask one of the darwin ppc64 people. Jack and Iain I think both
still have ppc64 boxes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects
[not found] <bug-34010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-17 23:34 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-18 0:06 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-18 18:44 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-18 0:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Segher, the only struct-layout-1.c failure I see that is related to PPC on the
GCC test results list is yours for "-m32 -mpowerpc64" running on ppc64. This
is 32-bit powerpc but with the ppc64 instruction set, is it not?
Did this test ever work?
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t002 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o link
...from: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-03/msg01870.html
That is, is it legitimately a regression?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects
[not found] <bug-34010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-18 0:06 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-18 18:44 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-03 6:31 ` [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.8/4.9 " amker at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: segher at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-18 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hi Aldy,
If the only thing failing is -m32 -mpowerpc64, that is likely another
problem. Not likely a regression either (but I don't have testresults
around going back more than a year or so; it failed then).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects
[not found] <bug-34010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-18 18:44 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-03 6:31 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-23 8:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: amker at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-03 6:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #11)
> Hi Aldy,
>
> If the only thing failing is -m32 -mpowerpc64, that is likely another
> problem. Not likely a regression either (but I don't have testresults
> around going back more than a year or so; it failed then).
Hmm, I saw same case failed at least on aarch64 bigendian, fsf-4.9 branch.
Not sure if same with this one, Here is log message:
spawn /.../obj/gcc2/gcc/xgcc -B/.../obj/gcc2/gcc/ -fno-diagnostics-show-caret
-fdiagnostics-color=never -w
-I/projects/.../src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat -Wno-abi
-DSKIP_DECIMAL_FLOAT -c -specs=aem-validation.specs -o c_compat_x_tst.o
/.../obj/gcc2/gcc/testsuite/gcc10/gcc.dg-struct-layout-1//t028_x.c
In file included from
/.../obj/gcc2/gcc/testsuite/gcc10/gcc.dg-struct-layout-1//t028_x.c:10:0:
/.../obj/gcc2/gcc/testsuite/gcc10/gcc.dg-struct-layout-1//t028_test.h: In
function 'checkx2823':
/projects/.../src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1_x2.h:11:22:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
/projects/.../src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.h:777:27:
note: in expansion of macro 'TX'
/.../obj/gcc2/gcc/testsuite/gcc10/gcc.dg-struct-layout-1//t028_test.h:24:1:
note: in expansion of macro 'T'
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
compiler exited with status 1
output is:
In file included from
/.../obj/gcc2/gcc/testsuite/gcc10/gcc.dg-struct-layout-1//t028_x.c:10:0:
/.../obj/gcc2/gcc/testsuite/gcc10/gcc.dg-struct-layout-1//t028_test.h: In
function 'checkx2823':
/projects/.../src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1_x2.h:11:22:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
/projects/.../src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.h:777:27:
note: in expansion of macro 'TX'
/.../obj/gcc2/gcc/testsuite/gcc10/gcc.dg-struct-layout-1//t028_test.h:24:1:
note: in expansion of macro 'T'
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t028 c_compat_x_tst.o compile, (internal
compiler error)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects
[not found] <bug-34010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-03 6:31 ` [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.8/4.9 " amker at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-23 8:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-16 8:24 ` [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.9 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-16 17:46 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-23 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.8.5 |4.9.3
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The gcc-4_8-branch is being closed, re-targeting regressions to 4.9.3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.9 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects
[not found] <bug-34010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-23 8:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-10-16 8:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-16 17:46 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-10-16 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Assuming fixed then.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.9 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects
[not found] <bug-34010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2015-10-16 8:24 ` [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.9 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-10-16 17:46 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: mrs at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-10-16 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
--- Comment #16 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org <mrs at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I checked https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-04/msg01438.html and the
failure is gone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread