From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3398 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2007 19:57:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 3298 invoked by uid 48); 10 Nov 2007 19:57:22 -0000 Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 19:57:00 -0000 Subject: [Bug c++/34056] New: [4.3 regression] ICE with parameter pack and pointer X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Message-ID: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00948.txt.bz2 The following invalid code snippet triggers an ICE on mainline: ===================================================================== template struct A { void foo(T*) { ++p; } T* p; }; ===================================================================== bug.cc:3: error: parameter packs not expanded with `...': bug.cc:3: note: 'T' bug.cc: In member function 'void A::foo()': bug.cc:3: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in build_unary_op, at cp/typeck.c:4296 Please submit a full bug report, [etc.] The testcase didn't crash before 2007-11-03, so it's probably fallout from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-11/msg00120.html -- Summary: [4.3 regression] ICE with parameter pack and pointer Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, error-recovery, monitored Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34056