public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/34103] New: [4.3 regression] ICE with invalid variadic template functions
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:54:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-34103-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
The following invalid testcase triggers an ICE on mainline:
============================================================
template<typename> struct A {};
template<typename...T> void foo(A<T>, A<T>);
template<typename...T> void foo(A<T>, A<T>) {}
============================================================
bug.cc:3: error: parameter packs not expanded with `...':
bug.cc:3: note: 'T'
bug.cc:5: error: parameter packs not expanded with `...':
bug.cc:5: note: 'T'
bug.cc:5: internal compiler error: canonical types differ for identical types
A<<expression error> > and A<<expression error> >
Please submit a full bug report, [etc.]
The bug appeared between 2007-11-03 and 2007-11-06.
--
Summary: [4.3 regression] ICE with invalid variadic template
functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, error-recovery, monitored
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34103
next reply other threads:[~2007-11-15 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-15 7:54 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2007-11-15 7:54 ` [Bug c++/34103] " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-19 5:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-27 21:58 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-27 22:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-27 22:16 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-20 21:04 ` dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-15 17:56 ` dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-15 18:50 ` dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-15 18:52 ` dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-16 12:30 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-01-16 13:27 ` dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-16 13:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-16 14:02 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-01-16 16:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-19 20:10 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-19 20:13 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2008-01-28 10:07 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2008-01-28 21:53 ` dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-29 14:02 ` dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-29 14:26 ` dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-34103-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).