[Bug ada/34290] New: Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call

[Bug ada/34290] New: Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call

[vgodunko at rostel dot ru]

Hello,

I have following compiler crash:

gcc -c main_windows-constructors.adb
+===========================GNAT BUG DETECTED==============================+
| 4.3.0 20071129 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure
exp_disp.adb:1111|
| Error detected at main_windows-constructors.adb:10:57                    |
| Please submit a bug report; see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html.            |
| Use a subject line meaningful to you and us to track the bug.            |
| Include the entire contents of this bug box in the report.               |
| Include the exact gcc or gnatmake command that you entered.              |
| Also include sources listed below in gnatchop format                     |
| (concatenated together with no headers between files).                   |
+==========================================================================+

After redefinition of Q_Frame as just limited interface without any progenitor
interfaces compiler output following error:

gcc -c main_windows-constructors.adb
main_windows-constructors.adb:10:57: no selector "Set_Central_Widget" for type
"Main_Window_Impl" defined at main_windows-impl.ads:6

This bug is absent in the 129029 revision.


-- 
           Summary: Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view
                    call
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: ada
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: vgodunko at rostel dot ru


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290

[Bug ada/34290] Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call

[vgodunko at rostel dot ru]

------- Comment #1 from vgodunko at rostel dot ru  2007-11-29 12:02 -------
Created an attachment (id=14667)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14667&action=view)
testcase


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290

[Bug ada/34290] Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call

[vgodunko at rostel dot ru]

-- 

vgodunko at rostel dot ru changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |major


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290

[Bug ada/34290] Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call

[sam at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #2 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-11-29 23:26 -------
Confirmed on SVN trunk

+===========================GNAT BUG DETECTED==============================+
| 4.3.0 20071129 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure
exp_disp.adb:1111|
| Error detected at main_windows-constructors.adb:10:57                    |


-- 

sam at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2007-11-29 23:26:05
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290

[Bug ada/34290] Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call

[sam at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-11-30 09:51 -------
As a workaround, it looks like you can use an explicit dereference instead of
an implicit one for the Set_Central_Widget call:


Main_Windows.Impl.Main_Window_Impl (Result.all)'Access.Set_Central_Widget
  (Main_Windows.Impl.Main_Window_Impl (Result.all).Text_Edit);


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290

[Bug ada/34290] Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call

[sam at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #4 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-11-30 09:54 -------
Of course, you should read "reference" instead of "dereference" in the previous
comment.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290

[Bug ada/34290] Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call

[sam at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

sam at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2007-11-29 23:26:05         |2007-12-06 19:03:20
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290

[Bug ada/34290] Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call

[sam at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

sam at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|sam at gcc dot gnu dot org  |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290

[Bug ada/34290] Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call

[sam at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #5 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-02 21:19 -------
Reconfirmed on SVN trunk

+===========================GNAT BUG DETECTED==============================+
| 4.5.0 20090930 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure
exp_disp.adb:1363|
| Error detected at main_windows-constructors.adb:10:57                    |


-- 

sam at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2007-12-06 19:03:20         |2009-10-02 21:19:48
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290