public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/34417] simplify '(x & A) % B' if 'B > A/2'
       [not found] <bug-34417-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-02-27  4:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-07-26 20:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-27  4:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34417

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-27 03:38:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Confirmed.
> 
> VRP could do this, though we generally avoid creating control flow and extra
> basic blocks here.

We could create a COND_EXPR here, though I don't know if that would be a good
idea on some targets.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/34417] simplify '(x & A) % B' if 'B > A/2'
       [not found] <bug-34417-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2012-02-27  4:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/34417] simplify '(x & A) % B' if 'B > A/2' pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-26 20:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34417

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2007-12-10 13:40:29         |2021-7-26

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Confirmed.
> > 
> > VRP could do this, though we generally avoid creating control flow and extra
> > basic blocks here.
> 
> We could create a COND_EXPR here, though I don't know if that would be a
> good idea on some targets.

Or we could just create the MIN_EXPR :) since that is what it is.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/34417] simplify '(x & A) % B' if 'B > A/2'
  2007-12-10 10:56 [Bug tree-optimization/34417] New: " wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be
@ 2007-12-10 13:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-12-10 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-12-10 13:40 -------
Confirmed.

VRP could do this, though we generally avoid creating control flow and extra
basic blocks here.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2007-12-10 13:40:29
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34417


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-26 20:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-34417-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-02-27  4:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/34417] simplify '(x & A) % B' if 'B > A/2' pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-26 20:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2007-12-10 10:56 [Bug tree-optimization/34417] New: " wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be
2007-12-10 13:40 ` [Bug tree-optimization/34417] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).